<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: DAC cable s in Next-Generation Firewall Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/dac-cable-s/m-p/1224949#M5740</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I've done this quite a bit without issue, most recently on a 5410.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 22:05:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rmfalconer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-03-27T22:05:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DAC cable s</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/dac-cable-s/m-p/1224451#M5731</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Has anybody used a Cisco DAC cable between a Cisco switch and a PAN firewall, or a PAN DAC cable , or a third party DAC cable? Any problems?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 15:25:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/dac-cable-s/m-p/1224451#M5731</guid>
      <dc:creator>ijohnston</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-21T15:25:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DAC cable s</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/dac-cable-s/m-p/1224949#M5740</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've done this quite a bit without issue, most recently on a 5410.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 22:05:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/dac-cable-s/m-p/1224949#M5740</guid>
      <dc:creator>rmfalconer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-27T22:05:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

