<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Firewalls in HA in Next-Generation Firewall Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/firewalls-in-ha/m-p/1229113#M5899</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Reaper,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the prompt response. I will check and update here.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 00:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SudarshanKasat03</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-05-15T00:45:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Firewalls in HA</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/firewalls-in-ha/m-p/1229044#M5892</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am facing one issue,&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN data-teams="true"&gt;my active firewall is not down but I am not able to access it via GUI and CLI (The management access is gone). In this case I want to make my secondary firewall as active. If I change the priority of secondary firewall will the change will be pushed in paloalto firewall? And will my secondary becomes the active one. My firewalls are managed via Panorama&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 08:26:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/firewalls-in-ha/m-p/1229044#M5892</guid>
      <dc:creator>SudarshanKasat03</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-14T08:26:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firewalls in HA</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/firewalls-in-ha/m-p/1229057#M5895</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;if both your firewalls are configured with preempt enabled, dropping the priority of the secondary below that of the primary will force the firewalls to fail over&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;if preempt was not set, you can run the following command to suspend the primary from the secondary:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="p1"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt; request high-availability state peer suspend&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 11:02:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/firewalls-in-ha/m-p/1229057#M5895</guid>
      <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-14T11:02:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firewalls in HA</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/firewalls-in-ha/m-p/1229113#M5899</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Reaper,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the prompt response. I will check and update here.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 00:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/firewalls-in-ha/m-p/1229113#M5899</guid>
      <dc:creator>SudarshanKasat03</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-15T00:45:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

