<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Ha failover for A/A firewall in Next-Generation Firewall Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/ha-failover-for-a-a-firewall/m-p/1229121#M5901</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/439732995"&gt;@V.Kumar296352&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;From your diagram, I would say :&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- the firewall A falls, the firewall B is already active, so not a big difference except the traffic load may increase on the node.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- the BGP will notice the peering down (depend on your BGP reactivity).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- depend on the configuration of the static route&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;--&amp;gt; the sessions are in sync between A and B, so existing sessions would be affected if your static routes / BGP routes did not removed at firewall A failure.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Olivier&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 04:21:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ozheng</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-05-15T04:21:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Ha failover for A/A firewall</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/ha-failover-for-a-a-firewall/m-p/1228350#M5873</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a setup of Active/Active firewall running with eBGP towards&amp;nbsp; router 1 and router 2 respectively&amp;nbsp; and static route for&amp;nbsp; Lan segment (subnet 1 and 2).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;eBGP with As-path prepend for subnet 2 at firewall 1 and As-path prepend for subnet 1 at firewall 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Static route from subnet 1 to hsrp ip&amp;nbsp; and static route for subnet 2 to hsrp ip. and static route at PA firewall for subnet 1 and subnet 2 to hsrp ip.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have two different subnet which is pointing to&amp;nbsp; subnet 1 with Active primary Firewall and&amp;nbsp; subnet 2 with Active Secondary firewall .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note:-we also need symmetric path .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What will happen if primary active firewall fail ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Is active session drop or continue through active secondary firewall ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please provide inputs for failover.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance community.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 08:54:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/ha-failover-for-a-a-firewall/m-p/1228350#M5873</guid>
      <dc:creator>V.Kumar296352</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-07T08:54:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ha failover for A/A firewall</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/ha-failover-for-a-a-firewall/m-p/1229121#M5901</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/439732995"&gt;@V.Kumar296352&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;From your diagram, I would say :&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- the firewall A falls, the firewall B is already active, so not a big difference except the traffic load may increase on the node.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- the BGP will notice the peering down (depend on your BGP reactivity).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- depend on the configuration of the static route&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;--&amp;gt; the sessions are in sync between A and B, so existing sessions would be affected if your static routes / BGP routes did not removed at firewall A failure.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Olivier&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 04:21:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/ha-failover-for-a-a-firewall/m-p/1229121#M5901</guid>
      <dc:creator>ozheng</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-15T04:21:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

