<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: BFD Between Virtual routers in Next-Generation Firewall Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/bfd-between-virtual-routers/m-p/1234646#M6120</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;For anyone wondering we tested this in our LAB and found that BFD does not want to work between VRs when using&amp;nbsp; Loopback Interfaces due to&amp;nbsp; /32 limitation.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Works fine on other interfaces.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 14:50:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DewaldVos</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-07-24T14:50:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>BFD Between Virtual routers</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/bfd-between-virtual-routers/m-p/1234367#M6104</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Community,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm sure this is a loaded question without any actual configuration data. But I was wondering are there any Limitation for BFD between two Virtual routers on the same firewall. We had a query from a customer stating that BFD looks like it does not want to work between 2 Virtual routers. From what I can gather, they are using BGP with Loopback interface but the BFD sessions are not establishing. Im sure there might be a config issue somewhere but just looking to see if we can rule out any limitations first. In my mind it should not be an issue but you never know. It's a PA1410...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 15:04:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/bfd-between-virtual-routers/m-p/1234367#M6104</guid>
      <dc:creator>DewaldVos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-21T15:04:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BFD Between Virtual routers</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/bfd-between-virtual-routers/m-p/1234646#M6120</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For anyone wondering we tested this in our LAB and found that BFD does not want to work between VRs when using&amp;nbsp; Loopback Interfaces due to&amp;nbsp; /32 limitation.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Works fine on other interfaces.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 14:50:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/bfd-between-virtual-routers/m-p/1234646#M6120</guid>
      <dc:creator>DewaldVos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-24T14:50:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

