<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: validation error &amp;quot;poe unexpected here&amp;quot; in Next-Generation Firewall Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/validation-error-quot-poe-unexpected-here-quot/m-p/1240874#M6413</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;This seems to be a big issue to me.&amp;nbsp; If someone accidently unticks 'PoE' it will mess up the config to the degree that aggregate interfaces will need to be recreated. Which will likely require changes to routing.&amp;nbsp; Whats the avenue to highlight bugs and feature requests to PA?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 01:01:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JimMcGrady</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-10-29T01:01:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>validation error "poe unexpected here"</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/validation-error-quot-poe-unexpected-here-quot/m-p/1234681#M6125</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to push policy from Panorama (11.1.6) to a PA-440 (10.2.13).&amp;nbsp; In Panorama, when looking at the config of an interface such as Ethernet1/1, it has a tick box for "PoE". However, on the same dialog on the PA-440 there is no PoE depicted. Now, when i try to push policy (whether PoE is ticked or not) it comes back with:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Validation Error:&lt;BR /&gt;network -&amp;gt; interface -&amp;gt; ethernet -&amp;gt; ethernet1/1 -&amp;gt; poe unexpected here&lt;BR /&gt;network -&amp;gt; interface -&amp;gt; ethernet is invalid&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 05:33:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/validation-error-quot-poe-unexpected-here-quot/m-p/1234681#M6125</guid>
      <dc:creator>JimMcGrady</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-25T05:33:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: validation error "poe unexpected here"</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/validation-error-quot-poe-unexpected-here-quot/m-p/1234683#M6126</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This looks to be the issue:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA14u000000g1QrCAI" target="_blank"&gt;Push from Panorama to Firewall fails due to invalid configurati... - Knowledge Base - Palo Alto Networks&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 07:16:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/validation-error-quot-poe-unexpected-here-quot/m-p/1234683#M6126</guid>
      <dc:creator>JimMcGrady</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-25T07:16:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: validation error "poe unexpected here"</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/validation-error-quot-poe-unexpected-here-quot/m-p/1240874#M6413</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This seems to be a big issue to me.&amp;nbsp; If someone accidently unticks 'PoE' it will mess up the config to the degree that aggregate interfaces will need to be recreated. Which will likely require changes to routing.&amp;nbsp; Whats the avenue to highlight bugs and feature requests to PA?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 01:01:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/validation-error-quot-poe-unexpected-here-quot/m-p/1240874#M6413</guid>
      <dc:creator>JimMcGrady</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-29T01:01:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

