<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PA-220 Login issue in Next-Generation Firewall Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pa-220-login-issue/m-p/1260471#M7054</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Richard,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Actually root partition issue for PA-220 looks "solved" at 11.1.5.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"PAN-258166&amp;nbsp;(PA-220 firewalls only) Fixed an issue where the root partition frequently reached 100%."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/11-1/pan-os-release-notes/pan-os-11-1-5-known-and-addressed-issues/pan-os-11-1-5-addressed-issues" target="_blank"&gt;https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/11-1/pan-os-release-notes/pan-os-11-1-5-known-and-addressed-issues/pan-os-11-1-5-addressed-issues&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But I couldn't try because 11.1 is not supported for PA-220.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Emre&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 14:30:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>YEmreSeven</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-07-30T14:30:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PA-220 Login issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pa-220-login-issue/m-p/1260315#M7043</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Everyone&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have a load of PA-220's in HA at variuos different sites, after a set period of time the devices stop allowing use to login.&amp;nbsp; Does not matter what method of Auth we try, it just does not work.&amp;nbsp; To compond the problem, if we do not resolve this issue eariler enough both devices at the site go offline taking the whole site down.&amp;nbsp; The issue started around 18 months to 2 years ago.&amp;nbsp; When we first had the issue we opened several support case with Palo Alto and ended up breaking several devices.&amp;nbsp; Those devices then had to be replaced by Palo Alto.&amp;nbsp; Eventually with Palo Alto support we found a workaround.&amp;nbsp; Here are the steps to get the firewalls back online.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. Connect with console cable to backup firewall&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. Power cycle the device&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3. Go into Maintenance Mode&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;4. Re-install PANOS.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;5. Reboot&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;6. Once the device is back online and the site is reachable again perform the same steps on the primary firewall.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So, we do have a workaround but that requires someone to be on site with a laptop that can give us access to the devices, which is not always an easy task.&amp;nbsp; All the PA-220's are located in off site data centers.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've only been working with Palo Alto devices for about 2.5 years, but my hunch is that 12 of the drives is filling up and causing the problem.&amp;nbsp; The issue is once we do the reinstall you can see what was the problem.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;One of our other senior engineers had reported that he had seen on a PA forum they issue could be linked to a memory issue and restarting a process on both PA's before pushing a configuration update out to the devices from Pnaorama.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can anyone suggests anything that we can monitor on the devices like memory or storage to see if the issues are related to either memory or storage?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Richard&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 11:03:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pa-220-login-issue/m-p/1260315#M7043</guid>
      <dc:creator>R.Moth</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-07-29T11:03:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-220 Login issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pa-220-login-issue/m-p/1260460#M7050</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1126377549"&gt;@R.Moth&lt;/a&gt;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Actually most of problem's root cause related with newer PANOS versions is not giving good performance with PA-220. So I can suggest stay in lower major versions as much as possible.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In my experience with PA-220, problems are starting after when root&amp;nbsp;partition usage over %95. Hardware reboot can be decrease a bit, but it will increase eventually. As I understand from your re-installing OS is also helping to clean whole disk.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can monitor your root partition too. And if you see the same behaviour, you can try these cleanup commands,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000ClaJCAS" target="_blank"&gt;https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000ClaJCAS&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Emre&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 12:32:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pa-220-login-issue/m-p/1260460#M7050</guid>
      <dc:creator>YEmreSeven</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-07-30T12:32:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-220 Login issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pa-220-login-issue/m-p/1260468#M7052</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Emre&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your reply, Palo Alto have feed the same information back to use yesterday.&amp;nbsp; I've setup some alerting in our monitoring tool to raise an Alert when the root partition goes over 91%.&amp;nbsp; At the moment they are all just under 90%.&amp;nbsp; I did run some checks on 1 device yesterday, but if that is the problem unless Palo Alto come up with a fix to free up more disk space we are always going to hit the problem after a period of time.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Richard&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 14:08:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pa-220-login-issue/m-p/1260468#M7052</guid>
      <dc:creator>R.Moth</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-07-30T14:08:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-220 Login issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pa-220-login-issue/m-p/1260471#M7054</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Richard,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Actually root partition issue for PA-220 looks "solved" at 11.1.5.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"PAN-258166&amp;nbsp;(PA-220 firewalls only) Fixed an issue where the root partition frequently reached 100%."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/11-1/pan-os-release-notes/pan-os-11-1-5-known-and-addressed-issues/pan-os-11-1-5-addressed-issues" target="_blank"&gt;https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/11-1/pan-os-release-notes/pan-os-11-1-5-known-and-addressed-issues/pan-os-11-1-5-addressed-issues&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But I couldn't try because 11.1 is not supported for PA-220.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Emre&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 14:30:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pa-220-login-issue/m-p/1260471#M7054</guid>
      <dc:creator>YEmreSeven</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-07-30T14:30:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-220 Login issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pa-220-login-issue/m-p/1260473#M7055</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Emre&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That's interesting, but as you say 11.1 is not support on the PA-220.&amp;nbsp; Don't understand why they fix the issue in 11.1 when that version is not suppoted.&amp;nbsp; I might raise a ticket with Palo Alto and see what they say.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm going to raise a&amp;nbsp; ticket with Palo Alto and see what the stance is on this.&amp;nbsp; Just wondering if the 220's are not offically supported in 11.1 but will work if installed.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for that information.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Richard&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 14:43:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pa-220-login-issue/m-p/1260473#M7055</guid>
      <dc:creator>R.Moth</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-07-30T14:43:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-220 Login issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pa-220-login-issue/m-p/1260497#M7059</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When you mention it doesnt allow login, are you referring to the GUI or CLI?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 19:17:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pa-220-login-issue/m-p/1260497#M7059</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-07-30T19:17:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

