<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic want to onboard panorama managed firewall on another cortex data lake instance in Panorama Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/panorama-discussions/want-to-onboard-panorama-managed-firewall-on-another-cortex-data/m-p/417082#M186</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We have two cortex data lake instance of 1 TB and 5 Tb , 5 TB we are already using to send the logs from all firewalls which are panorama managed. So for 1 TB logging instance panorama is not bind. For 5 TB logging instance panorama is bind.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As this 1 TB is not utilized and our logs are started to purge from 5 TB logging service instance , we want to onboard one firewall (which is panorama managed ) on 1 TB logging service instance to store the logs.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have reviewed complete cortex data lake admin guide , as per doc we can onboard firewall directly if its on 10.0 and not panorama managed.. need confirmation on same.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If we can onboard panorama managed firewall on 1 TB logging service instance , is there any chances of loss of logs of that onboarded firewall. Means the logs stored in 5 TB logging instance should not be erased for that onboarded firewall.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 19:00:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Deepak25</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-04-18T19:00:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>want to onboard panorama managed firewall on another cortex data lake instance</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/panorama-discussions/want-to-onboard-panorama-managed-firewall-on-another-cortex-data/m-p/417082#M186</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have two cortex data lake instance of 1 TB and 5 Tb , 5 TB we are already using to send the logs from all firewalls which are panorama managed. So for 1 TB logging instance panorama is not bind. For 5 TB logging instance panorama is bind.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As this 1 TB is not utilized and our logs are started to purge from 5 TB logging service instance , we want to onboard one firewall (which is panorama managed ) on 1 TB logging service instance to store the logs.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have reviewed complete cortex data lake admin guide , as per doc we can onboard firewall directly if its on 10.0 and not panorama managed.. need confirmation on same.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If we can onboard panorama managed firewall on 1 TB logging service instance , is there any chances of loss of logs of that onboarded firewall. Means the logs stored in 5 TB logging instance should not be erased for that onboarded firewall.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 19:00:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/panorama-discussions/want-to-onboard-panorama-managed-firewall-on-another-cortex-data/m-p/417082#M186</guid>
      <dc:creator>Deepak25</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-18T19:00:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

