<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SDWAN PAN-OS and Panorama - Docs are rough in Panorama Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/panorama-discussions/sdwan-pan-os-and-panorama-docs-are-rough/m-p/412355#M274</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I see. So the SDWAN being enabled and passing the default gateway parameter is sufficient for the routing, thus, having the route added via the option could undermine BGP. I believe this does make sense. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2021 13:34:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dpayne</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-06-10T13:34:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SDWAN PAN-OS and Panorama - Docs are rough</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/panorama-discussions/sdwan-pan-os-and-panorama-docs-are-rough/m-p/412116#M272</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am working through the panorama/sdwan plugin docs for a new deployment using Nextgen firewalls' built in SDWAN, all on 10.0.6 and the plugin version is 2.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the docs there seems to be some conflicting advice. See below. Anyone know which is correct here? I have to ship these devices off, and obviously having this setting wrong will cause some pain.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="dpayne_0-1623254186161.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/34322iC5D3AFDE2CA6930A/image-size/medium/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="dpayne_0-1623254186161.png" alt="dpayne_0-1623254186161.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 15:57:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/panorama-discussions/sdwan-pan-os-and-panorama-docs-are-rough/m-p/412116#M272</guid>
      <dc:creator>dpayne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-09T15:57:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDWAN PAN-OS and Panorama - Docs are rough</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/panorama-discussions/sdwan-pan-os-and-panorama-docs-are-rough/m-p/412339#M273</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/168773"&gt;@dpayne&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You don't want to undermine any dynamic routing decisions (eg. BGP, OSPF) by adding the default route by default.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Actually the top arrow in your screenshot doesn't mention adding a default route ... it just mentions getting the default gateway assigned from the DHCP server.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope it helps !&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Kiwi.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV id="ConnectiveDocSignExtentionInstalled" data-extension-version="1.0.4"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2021 12:13:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/panorama-discussions/sdwan-pan-os-and-panorama-docs-are-rough/m-p/412339#M273</guid>
      <dc:creator>kiwi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-10T12:13:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDWAN PAN-OS and Panorama - Docs are rough</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/panorama-discussions/sdwan-pan-os-and-panorama-docs-are-rough/m-p/412355#M274</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I see. So the SDWAN being enabled and passing the default gateway parameter is sufficient for the routing, thus, having the route added via the option could undermine BGP. I believe this does make sense. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2021 13:34:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/panorama-discussions/sdwan-pan-os-and-panorama-docs-are-rough/m-p/412355#M274</guid>
      <dc:creator>dpayne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-10T13:34:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

