<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Panorama passive device redistributing User-ID mappings? in Panorama Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/panorama-discussions/panorama-passive-device-redistributing-user-id-mappings/m-p/1229265#M2880</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear community!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have configured user-ID redistribution to send mappings to firewalls from Panorama. The same config as the following:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.packetswitch.co.uk/palo-alto-user-id-redistribution/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.packetswitch.co.uk/palo-alto-user-id-redistribution/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have to panoramas in active/passive and some firewalls are having alarms like the following:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Issue description :: Redistribution Agent Panorama2(vsys1):&amp;nbsp; details: close connection to agent.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Severity :: High&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That´s is the passive Panorama. I assume that the passive Panorama doesn´t participate in the User-ID redistribution and thus the firewall cannot just connect to its User-ID agent service. Anyone could confirm this? I didn´t find any statement in official resources.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 11:32:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Carracido</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-05-16T11:32:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Panorama passive device redistributing User-ID mappings?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/panorama-discussions/panorama-passive-device-redistributing-user-id-mappings/m-p/1229265#M2880</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear community!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have configured user-ID redistribution to send mappings to firewalls from Panorama. The same config as the following:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.packetswitch.co.uk/palo-alto-user-id-redistribution/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.packetswitch.co.uk/palo-alto-user-id-redistribution/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have to panoramas in active/passive and some firewalls are having alarms like the following:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Issue description :: Redistribution Agent Panorama2(vsys1):&amp;nbsp; details: close connection to agent.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Severity :: High&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That´s is the passive Panorama. I assume that the passive Panorama doesn´t participate in the User-ID redistribution and thus the firewall cannot just connect to its User-ID agent service. Anyone could confirm this? I didn´t find any statement in official resources.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 11:32:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/panorama-discussions/panorama-passive-device-redistributing-user-id-mappings/m-p/1229265#M2880</guid>
      <dc:creator>Carracido</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-16T11:32:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Panorama passive device redistributing User-ID mappings?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/panorama-discussions/panorama-passive-device-redistributing-user-id-mappings/m-p/1229289#M2881</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;HI&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/24977"&gt;@Carracido&lt;/a&gt;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I can confirm similar behaviour with the NGFWs. I wrote a thread on it here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/food-for-thought-data-redistribution-during-ha-failover-user-id/m-p/1219823" target="_blank"&gt;LIVEcommunity - Food for Thought - Data Redistribution during HA Failover - User-ID - LIVEcommunity - 1219823&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On a similar thread, recently I moved a configuration towards Panorama being used as the Data Redistribution Agent. I did configure the Data Redistribution Clients (the NGFWs) to connect to the Data Redistribution Agent on Panorama via host and port, however, I am curious if configuring the&amp;nbsp;Data Redistribution Clients (the NGFWs) to connect to the Data Redistribution Agent on Panorama via Serial Number will make a difference. In my case, Panorama was not HA, so the problem does not apply.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Let me know your thoughts!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 16:50:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/panorama-discussions/panorama-passive-device-redistributing-user-id-mappings/m-p/1229289#M2881</guid>
      <dc:creator>nohash4u</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-16T16:50:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

