<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Replacing the vm-series firewall with prisma access in Prisma Access Cloud Management Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/prisma-access-cloud-management/replacing-the-vm-series-firewall-with-prisma-access/m-p/1001525#M48</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV class="flex-shrink-0 flex flex-col relative items-end"&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class="pt-0"&gt;
&lt;DIV class="gizmo-bot-avatar flex h-8 w-8 items-center justify-center overflow-hidden rounded-full"&gt;
&lt;DIV class="relative p-1 rounded-sm flex items-center justify-center bg-token-main-surface-primary text-token-text-primary h-8 w-8"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class="group/conversation-turn relative flex w-full min-w-0 flex-col agent-turn"&gt;
&lt;DIV class="flex-col gap-1 md:gap-3"&gt;
&lt;DIV class="flex max-w-full flex-col flex-grow"&gt;
&lt;DIV class="min-h-8 text-message flex w-full flex-col items-end gap-2 whitespace-normal break-words text-start [.text-message+&amp;amp;]:mt-5" dir="auto" data-message-author-role="assistant" data-message-id="9a092b33-ff4c-43a5-8716-ff4d3b7132b4" data-message-model-slug="gpt-4o-mini"&gt;
&lt;DIV class="flex w-full flex-col gap-1 empty:hidden first:pt-[3px]"&gt;
&lt;DIV class="markdown prose w-full break-words dark:prose-invert dark"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I want to replace the VM-Series firewall with Prisma Access, but I need to weigh the pros and cons before moving to this setup. Therefore, I would appreciate your input in providing a solution for this SASE architecture.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here are a few points I have collected:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Low latency in Prisma Access: Since we will spin up the nearest gateway based on major user logins, considering the VM-Series firewall for GP connections, SASE will be more effective.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Management and scalability: With high resource utilization, this is handled by Palo Alto itself. However, with the VM-Series firewall, we would need to maintain the IaaS.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If anyone has additional points that need to be addressed in the SASE architecture, it would be very helpful.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Akash Thangavel&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2025 10:37:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AkashThangavel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-01-09T10:37:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Replacing the vm-series firewall with prisma access</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/prisma-access-cloud-management/replacing-the-vm-series-firewall-with-prisma-access/m-p/1001525#M48</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV class="flex-shrink-0 flex flex-col relative items-end"&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class="pt-0"&gt;
&lt;DIV class="gizmo-bot-avatar flex h-8 w-8 items-center justify-center overflow-hidden rounded-full"&gt;
&lt;DIV class="relative p-1 rounded-sm flex items-center justify-center bg-token-main-surface-primary text-token-text-primary h-8 w-8"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class="group/conversation-turn relative flex w-full min-w-0 flex-col agent-turn"&gt;
&lt;DIV class="flex-col gap-1 md:gap-3"&gt;
&lt;DIV class="flex max-w-full flex-col flex-grow"&gt;
&lt;DIV class="min-h-8 text-message flex w-full flex-col items-end gap-2 whitespace-normal break-words text-start [.text-message+&amp;amp;]:mt-5" dir="auto" data-message-author-role="assistant" data-message-id="9a092b33-ff4c-43a5-8716-ff4d3b7132b4" data-message-model-slug="gpt-4o-mini"&gt;
&lt;DIV class="flex w-full flex-col gap-1 empty:hidden first:pt-[3px]"&gt;
&lt;DIV class="markdown prose w-full break-words dark:prose-invert dark"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I want to replace the VM-Series firewall with Prisma Access, but I need to weigh the pros and cons before moving to this setup. Therefore, I would appreciate your input in providing a solution for this SASE architecture.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here are a few points I have collected:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Low latency in Prisma Access: Since we will spin up the nearest gateway based on major user logins, considering the VM-Series firewall for GP connections, SASE will be more effective.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Management and scalability: With high resource utilization, this is handled by Palo Alto itself. However, with the VM-Series firewall, we would need to maintain the IaaS.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If anyone has additional points that need to be addressed in the SASE architecture, it would be very helpful.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Akash Thangavel&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2025 10:37:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/prisma-access-cloud-management/replacing-the-vm-series-firewall-with-prisma-access/m-p/1001525#M48</guid>
      <dc:creator>AkashThangavel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-09T10:37:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

