<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Prisma Cloud RQL json.rule options in Prisma Cloud Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/prisma-cloud-discussions/prisma-cloud-rql-json-rule-options/m-p/1250395#M1557</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey Paul!&lt;BR /&gt;If the everything was the same, you could use a construction like "not in ()" or ". . . is not member of (string, string,string).&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;However, you have two entries that are for "tags[*].key" and one that is for "tags[*].value", so since those are inconsistent, you can't put them in a list like above.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 18:08:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JCalloway1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-03-17T18:08:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Prisma Cloud RQL json.rule options</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/prisma-cloud-discussions/prisma-cloud-rql-json-rule-options/m-p/1250390#M1556</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is it possible to use an array or list of values when comparing few values for a json.rule within an RQL?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For example, in the following RQL, can we combine the "tags[*].key" comparison values to a list of items &lt;EM&gt;(&lt;/EM&gt;such as something like&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;'does not contain ["PatchGroup", "Patch Group", "patch-window", "prismacloud-scan"]')&lt;/EM&gt; rather than having them defined separately?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;config from cloud.resource where cloud.type = 'aws' and api.name = 'aws-ec2-describe-instances' AND json.rule = tags[*].key does not contain "Patch Group" and tags[*].key does not contain "PatchGroup" and tags[*].key does not contain "patch-window" and tags[*].value does not contain "prismacloud-scan"&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Paul&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:52:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/prisma-cloud-discussions/prisma-cloud-rql-json-rule-options/m-p/1250390#M1556</guid>
      <dc:creator>SPAUL2008</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-17T16:52:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Prisma Cloud RQL json.rule options</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/prisma-cloud-discussions/prisma-cloud-rql-json-rule-options/m-p/1250395#M1557</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey Paul!&lt;BR /&gt;If the everything was the same, you could use a construction like "not in ()" or ". . . is not member of (string, string,string).&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;However, you have two entries that are for "tags[*].key" and one that is for "tags[*].value", so since those are inconsistent, you can't put them in a list like above.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 18:08:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/prisma-cloud-discussions/prisma-cloud-rql-json-rule-options/m-p/1250395#M1557</guid>
      <dc:creator>JCalloway1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-17T18:08:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Prisma Cloud RQL json.rule options</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/prisma-cloud-discussions/prisma-cloud-rql-json-rule-options/m-p/1250398#M1560</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;is not a member of ('','','')&lt;/EM&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;seems to be working for the same parameter.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;config from cloud.resource where cloud.type = 'aws' and api.name = 'aws-ec2-describe-instances' AND json.rule = tags[*].key is not member of ( 'Patch Group', 'PatchGroup', 'patching-window') and tags[*].value does not contain "prismacloud-scan"&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 18:27:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/prisma-cloud-discussions/prisma-cloud-rql-json-rule-options/m-p/1250398#M1560</guid>
      <dc:creator>SPAUL2008</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-17T18:27:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Prisma Cloud RQL json.rule options</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/prisma-cloud-discussions/prisma-cloud-rql-json-rule-options/m-p/1250399#M1561</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey Paul!&lt;BR /&gt;Excellent!&amp;nbsp; I'm glad that works!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 18:29:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/prisma-cloud-discussions/prisma-cloud-rql-json-rule-options/m-p/1250399#M1561</guid>
      <dc:creator>JCalloway1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-17T18:29:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Prisma Cloud RQL json.rule options</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/prisma-cloud-discussions/prisma-cloud-rql-json-rule-options/m-p/1250401#M1562</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sorry, I spoke too soon.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;When comparing outputs from both of these queries side-by-side, I can see some false positives from the new one!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 18:47:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/prisma-cloud-discussions/prisma-cloud-rql-json-rule-options/m-p/1250401#M1562</guid>
      <dc:creator>SPAUL2008</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-17T18:47:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

