<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Prisma SD-WAN static route redistribution to BGP in Prisma SD-WAN Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/prisma-sd-wan-discussions/prisma-sd-wan-static-route-redistribution-to-bgp/m-p/581104#M167</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yup. Same problem here.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is infuriatingly dumb. This is not really a feature request as much as a broken beta software issue.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In addition to having to work around the networking shortcomings of Azure, I now have to work around the shortcomings of both Azure and the Palo Alto IONs. Receiving broken networking functionality from Microsoft (or other cloud providers) is something I can deal with, but I expect better from Palo Alto. At least Azure has the excuse that it's fake networking.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 19:42:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JeroenvE</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-03-20T19:42:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Prisma SD-WAN static route redistribution to BGP</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/prisma-sd-wan-discussions/prisma-sd-wan-static-route-redistribution-to-bgp/m-p/559944#M118</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello all,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have multiple vIONs (in DC mode) interconnecting our AWS clouds with our Prisma SD-WAN environment, via the AWS TGW CloudBlade integration.&amp;nbsp; Also, we're using the vIONs to terminate some 3rd party VPNs.&amp;nbsp; The VPN routes, if learned via BGP, are redistributed to other BGP peers with no problem.&amp;nbsp; However, static route redistribution to BGP does not work.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;From an earlier conversation with the TAC, this issue may be endemic to the DC mode of operation and has long been an unfulfilled feature request.&amp;nbsp; However, has anyone else run into this redistribution problem with Prisma SD-WAN?&amp;nbsp; Is there a workaround?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for any feedback.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;JB&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2023 22:28:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/prisma-sd-wan-discussions/prisma-sd-wan-static-route-redistribution-to-bgp/m-p/559944#M118</guid>
      <dc:creator>jburrell8</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-28T22:28:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Prisma SD-WAN static route redistribution to BGP</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/prisma-sd-wan-discussions/prisma-sd-wan-static-route-redistribution-to-bgp/m-p/581104#M167</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yup. Same problem here.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is infuriatingly dumb. This is not really a feature request as much as a broken beta software issue.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In addition to having to work around the networking shortcomings of Azure, I now have to work around the shortcomings of both Azure and the Palo Alto IONs. Receiving broken networking functionality from Microsoft (or other cloud providers) is something I can deal with, but I expect better from Palo Alto. At least Azure has the excuse that it's fake networking.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 19:42:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/prisma-sd-wan-discussions/prisma-sd-wan-static-route-redistribution-to-bgp/m-p/581104#M167</guid>
      <dc:creator>JeroenvE</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-20T19:42:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

