<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ION9000 Bandwidth Test in Prisma SD-WAN Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/prisma-sd-wan-discussions/ion9000-bandwidth-test/m-p/516688#M40</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have some ION 9000s deployed in branches and have just brought up basic connectivity (no tunnels etc). I trying to run the bw-test command to see what the internet circuits look like but the command isn't giving me any real details. (see below). Currently all on 5.6.1-b18.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Interface 1 is the internet facing interface. Traffic to internet is functional and the controller interfaces are all talking to cloud management NAT'd through the ION.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is this a bug in this code release? Am i missing something in the debug or configuration? It looks like it should be pretty straight forward but this test command seems to be giving useless results.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;debug bw-test src-interface 1 destination=pcm.cgnx.net&lt;BR /&gt;Press CTR+C to stop.&lt;BR /&gt;Units of downlink and uplink capacity measurement are Mbps.&lt;BR /&gt;capacity_uplink 0.000000read entry not available. go with default&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Final Downlink capacity estimate: 0.00&lt;BR /&gt;-------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Downlink percentage loss: 0.00&lt;BR /&gt;Downlink Jitter: 0.00 ms&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Final Uplink capacity estimate: 0.00&lt;BR /&gt;-------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Uplink rtt: 69.78 ms&lt;BR /&gt;Uplink Percentage Loss: 0.00&lt;BR /&gt;Uplink Jitter: 1.26 ms&lt;BR /&gt;----------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;LI-PRODUCT title="Prisma SD-WAN" id="Prisma_SD-WAN"&gt;&lt;/LI-PRODUCT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2022 21:56:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jon_Woloshyn</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-10-03T21:56:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ION9000 Bandwidth Test</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/prisma-sd-wan-discussions/ion9000-bandwidth-test/m-p/516688#M40</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have some ION 9000s deployed in branches and have just brought up basic connectivity (no tunnels etc). I trying to run the bw-test command to see what the internet circuits look like but the command isn't giving me any real details. (see below). Currently all on 5.6.1-b18.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Interface 1 is the internet facing interface. Traffic to internet is functional and the controller interfaces are all talking to cloud management NAT'd through the ION.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is this a bug in this code release? Am i missing something in the debug or configuration? It looks like it should be pretty straight forward but this test command seems to be giving useless results.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;debug bw-test src-interface 1 destination=pcm.cgnx.net&lt;BR /&gt;Press CTR+C to stop.&lt;BR /&gt;Units of downlink and uplink capacity measurement are Mbps.&lt;BR /&gt;capacity_uplink 0.000000read entry not available. go with default&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Final Downlink capacity estimate: 0.00&lt;BR /&gt;-------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Downlink percentage loss: 0.00&lt;BR /&gt;Downlink Jitter: 0.00 ms&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Final Uplink capacity estimate: 0.00&lt;BR /&gt;-------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Uplink rtt: 69.78 ms&lt;BR /&gt;Uplink Percentage Loss: 0.00&lt;BR /&gt;Uplink Jitter: 1.26 ms&lt;BR /&gt;----------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;LI-PRODUCT title="Prisma SD-WAN" id="Prisma_SD-WAN"&gt;&lt;/LI-PRODUCT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2022 21:56:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/prisma-sd-wan-discussions/ion9000-bandwidth-test/m-p/516688#M40</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jon_Woloshyn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-03T21:56:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ION9000 Bandwidth Test</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/prisma-sd-wan-discussions/ion9000-bandwidth-test/m-p/516698#M41</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Jon,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The command you used may not help you with appropriate data, it has multiple factors involved in it, and sometimes results are unexpected. You can raise a TAC case and request them to share BW results from device backend access. Backend command is&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;#speedtest-cli --source &amp;lt;INT interface ip address&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2022 03:02:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/prisma-sd-wan-discussions/ion9000-bandwidth-test/m-p/516698#M41</guid>
      <dc:creator>kn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-04T03:02:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

