<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Second Global Protect Gateway in VM-Series in the Private Cloud</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-private-cloud/second-global-protect-gateway/m-p/473050#M26</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Up to now I've just had a single portal and gateway on an existing PAN 3220 pair.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;I had a couple of questions..&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) What determines when traffic gets sent to the second gateway instead of the on-board gateway?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Can the same certificate be used for both gateways? I use certificate based authentication. The server certificate on the existing firewall is gp.acme.com - would this same certificate go onto the new gateway as well? I ask as the two gateways would have different IP addresses.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) If the virtual PAN/secondary gateway was on the inside of DMZ interface of the hardware PAN, would it be still able to serve as the secondary gateway?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2022 23:57:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>palomed</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-03-14T23:57:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Second Global Protect Gateway</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-private-cloud/second-global-protect-gateway/m-p/473050#M26</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Up to now I've just had a single portal and gateway on an existing PAN 3220 pair.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;I had a couple of questions..&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) What determines when traffic gets sent to the second gateway instead of the on-board gateway?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Can the same certificate be used for both gateways? I use certificate based authentication. The server certificate on the existing firewall is gp.acme.com - would this same certificate go onto the new gateway as well? I ask as the two gateways would have different IP addresses.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) If the virtual PAN/secondary gateway was on the inside of DMZ interface of the hardware PAN, would it be still able to serve as the secondary gateway?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2022 23:57:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-private-cloud/second-global-protect-gateway/m-p/473050#M26</guid>
      <dc:creator>palomed</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-14T23:57:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Second Global Protect Gateway</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-private-cloud/second-global-protect-gateway/m-p/473382#M27</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;1) What determines when traffic gets sent to the second gateway instead of the on-board gateway?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Based on your config on portal.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-If you choose auto gateway selection with same weight it uses ssl response time. You can see it on PANGPS log and PANGPA logs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Can the same certificate be used for both gateways? I use certificate based authentication. The server certificate on the existing firewall is gp.acme.com - would this same certificate go onto the new gateway as well? I ask as the two gateways would have different IP addresses.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-For gateway config if you have wildcard certificate which is not recommended but somehow it works you can use.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-If you have a wildcard certificate which has your two gateway FQDN address&amp;nbsp; as subject alt name it works and recommended you can use.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Else, (An idea, I did not try.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;İf you create two DNS record for your VPN gateways and portals example;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DNS Record1 vpn.acme.com = 1.2.3.4&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DNS Record2 vpn.acme.com = 1.2.3.5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Same certificate should be usable. User will connect which response (faster one) they get.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You mentioned "I use certificate based authentication. "&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;İt is a authentication mechanism which is not related gatway and portal certificate config. You can use same Autjentication Certificate profile for other gateways.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) If the virtual PAN/secondary gateway was on the inside of DMZ interface of the hardware PAN, would it be still able to serve as the secondary gateway?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;İf its behind NAT (Not reccomended because NAT means you are making packets more small so SSL connections may be fail.) After Creating requered rule on Hardware PAN should work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another Option create sub interfaces on Hardware PAN and serve more than one Portal and Gateway on same firewall (I am running 8 Portal and different gateway on same Hardware PAN).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I suggest before taking action Create a test gateway and portal then see results.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have a nice day.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2022 20:22:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-private-cloud/second-global-protect-gateway/m-p/473382#M27</guid>
      <dc:creator>upelister</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-15T20:22:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

