<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Unused and Duplicate Address Object Script in Automation/API Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/automation-api-discussions/unused-and-duplicate-address-object-script/m-p/191525#M1524</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I saw previously someone posted a Perl script that finds unused address objects, but had some limitations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From my end, I'm looking at trying to report on this via Powershell through the Invoke-RestMethod cmdlet that I've done against other bits of the API.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What in the schema (if any) on an address object determines whether or not it's actually being used?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any and all insight(s) greatly appreciated &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 14:12:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>f1r3withf1r3</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-12-13T14:12:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Unused and Duplicate Address Object Script</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/automation-api-discussions/unused-and-duplicate-address-object-script/m-p/191525#M1524</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I saw previously someone posted a Perl script that finds unused address objects, but had some limitations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From my end, I'm looking at trying to report on this via Powershell through the Invoke-RestMethod cmdlet that I've done against other bits of the API.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What in the schema (if any) on an address object determines whether or not it's actually being used?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any and all insight(s) greatly appreciated &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 14:12:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/automation-api-discussions/unused-and-duplicate-address-object-script/m-p/191525#M1524</guid>
      <dc:creator>f1r3withf1r3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-13T14:12:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unused and Duplicate Address Object Script</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/automation-api-discussions/unused-and-duplicate-address-object-script/m-p/195341#M1539</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Well, there's nothing in the address object definition itself that says if it is being used.&amp;nbsp; This means that you'd need to comb through the other places in the config where an address object could be referenced.&amp;nbsp; This includes stuff like address groups and various (all?) policy types.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:10:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/automation-api-discussions/unused-and-duplicate-address-object-script/m-p/195341#M1539</guid>
      <dc:creator>gfreeman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-16T17:10:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

