<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: How to automate rules with App-ID in Automation/API Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/automation-api-discussions/how-to-automate-rules-with-app-id/m-p/280036#M1982</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;One of the workflows I've seen allows users to select AppIDs on the FW CR form. Depending on your user base you could limit the AppID list to a curated selection, or do something fancy like filter based on which port the user selects. &amp;nbsp;You can pull the AppID DB from the firewalls/Panorama using the API, and the Application Default ports are listed for each AppID, so the data could come from there.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 21:32:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>drogers</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-07-30T21:32:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How to automate rules with App-ID</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/automation-api-discussions/how-to-automate-rules-with-app-id/m-p/280030#M1981</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;How can you automate firewall rule creation when App-ID is used? This seems easy enough on a port-based firewall, but I have yet to see anything addressing APP-ID. A typcial flow could look like this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;user submits firewall request form&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;appropriate approvals submitted&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;automation handles the form&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;automation provisions the firewall based on the approved user request&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How are people handling the automation/form submittal process when App-ID is used? The APP-ID webpage provides information as to what applications are available but does not seem to fit the use case listed above.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope you are having a great day!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 20:27:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/automation-api-discussions/how-to-automate-rules-with-app-id/m-p/280030#M1981</guid>
      <dc:creator>MicahGawin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-30T20:27:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to automate rules with App-ID</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/automation-api-discussions/how-to-automate-rules-with-app-id/m-p/280036#M1982</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;One of the workflows I've seen allows users to select AppIDs on the FW CR form. Depending on your user base you could limit the AppID list to a curated selection, or do something fancy like filter based on which port the user selects. &amp;nbsp;You can pull the AppID DB from the firewalls/Panorama using the API, and the Application Default ports are listed for each AppID, so the data could come from there.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 21:32:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/automation-api-discussions/how-to-automate-rules-with-app-id/m-p/280036#M1982</guid>
      <dc:creator>drogers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-30T21:32:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to automate rules with App-ID</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/automation-api-discussions/how-to-automate-rules-with-app-id/m-p/280057#M1983</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks! I was trying to parse the data from the App-ID website, I didnt realize I could use the local API.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 21:54:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/automation-api-discussions/how-to-automate-rules-with-app-id/m-p/280057#M1983</guid>
      <dc:creator>MicahGawin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-30T21:54:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to automate rules with App-ID</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/automation-api-discussions/how-to-automate-rules-with-app-id/m-p/280066#M1984</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I like the curated selection approach that&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2876"&gt;@drogers&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;mentions because it will silmplify the request process and require less rework when the wrong application is selected.&amp;nbsp; Giving an end-user a choice of 3,000+ App-ID signatures would be asking for trouble.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screen Shot 2019-07-30 at 6.01.40 PM.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/20831iF0CD638FAF49BCCA/image-size/large/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Screen Shot 2019-07-30 at 6.01.40 PM.png" alt="Screen Shot 2019-07-30 at 6.01.40 PM.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 22:05:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/automation-api-discussions/how-to-automate-rules-with-app-id/m-p/280066#M1984</guid>
      <dc:creator>rhagen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-30T22:05:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

