<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is there any workaround to avoid the limitation of regex size is less than 7 bytes in Automation/API Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/automation-api-discussions/is-there-any-workaround-to-avoid-the-limitation-of-regex-size-is/m-p/13675#M345</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, this is a huge limitation by stream based design . Also 7 bytes/characters have to be continuous. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(ABCDEFG) is accepted&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(&lt;A&gt;&lt;B&gt;&lt;C&gt;&lt;D&gt;&lt;E&gt;&lt;F&gt;) is not accepted.&lt;/F&gt;&lt;/E&gt;&lt;/D&gt;&lt;/C&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope in the future this can be avoided due to strong limitation in regex pattern creation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 17:34:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>NGS_SOC</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-05T17:34:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is there any workaround to avoid the limitation of regex size is less than 7 bytes</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/automation-api-discussions/is-there-any-workaround-to-avoid-the-limitation-of-regex-size-is/m-p/13673#M343</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have requirements to block some keywords which are less than 7 bytes in size,device has limitation to use the keyworks(regex ) with less than 7 byes in size .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any workaround or alternate solutions to block some keywords with less than 7 bytes .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BIJILESH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 06:14:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/automation-api-discussions/is-there-any-workaround-to-avoid-the-limitation-of-regex-size-is/m-p/13673#M343</guid>
      <dc:creator>bijilesh.k</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-10T06:14:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is there any workaround to avoid the limitation of regex size is less than 7 bytes</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/automation-api-discussions/is-there-any-workaround-to-avoid-the-limitation-of-regex-size-is/m-p/13674#M344</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;unfortunately , the answer is no .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:48:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/automation-api-discussions/is-there-any-workaround-to-avoid-the-limitation-of-regex-size-is/m-p/13674#M344</guid>
      <dc:creator>winwan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-16T15:48:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is there any workaround to avoid the limitation of regex size is less than 7 bytes</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/automation-api-discussions/is-there-any-workaround-to-avoid-the-limitation-of-regex-size-is/m-p/13675#M345</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, this is a huge limitation by stream based design . Also 7 bytes/characters have to be continuous. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(ABCDEFG) is accepted&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(&lt;A&gt;&lt;B&gt;&lt;C&gt;&lt;D&gt;&lt;E&gt;&lt;F&gt;) is not accepted.&lt;/F&gt;&lt;/E&gt;&lt;/D&gt;&lt;/C&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope in the future this can be avoided due to strong limitation in regex pattern creation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 17:34:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/automation-api-discussions/is-there-any-workaround-to-avoid-the-limitation-of-regex-size-is/m-p/13675#M345</guid>
      <dc:creator>NGS_SOC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-05T17:34:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is there any workaround to avoid the limitation of regex size is less than 7 bytes</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/automation-api-discussions/is-there-any-workaround-to-avoid-the-limitation-of-regex-size-is/m-p/13676#M346</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whilst we are talking about the 7 byte limit on regex - can it contain spaces ? I have some very annoying spam bounce problems at the moment, the only identifying feature appears to be the subject line - "Can i turst you?" (caps &amp;amp; spelling as in the email) - Ive created a data pattern "Can i turst you\?" which I would expect to match these mails which commits but does not appear to work. Any ideas ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 10:26:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/automation-api-discussions/is-there-any-workaround-to-avoid-the-limitation-of-regex-size-is/m-p/13676#M346</guid>
      <dc:creator>SimmSimm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-09T10:26:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is there any workaround to avoid the limitation of regex size is less than 7 bytes</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/automation-api-discussions/is-there-any-workaround-to-avoid-the-limitation-of-regex-size-is/m-p/13677#M347</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you try this format "Can\ i\ turst\ you"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 11:53:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/automation-api-discussions/is-there-any-workaround-to-avoid-the-limitation-of-regex-size-is/m-p/13677#M347</guid>
      <dc:creator>winwan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-09T11:53:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is there any workaround to avoid the limitation of regex size is less than 7 bytes</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/automation-api-discussions/is-there-any-workaround-to-avoid-the-limitation-of-regex-size-is/m-p/13678#M348</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the suggestion - strangely it now works as above, without escaping the spaces so perhaps it was something else in the data filter it didnt like. Its all a bit of a mystery, but the spam is all being rejected now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 12:30:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/automation-api-discussions/is-there-any-workaround-to-avoid-the-limitation-of-regex-size-is/m-p/13678#M348</guid>
      <dc:creator>SimmSimm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-09T12:30:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

