<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Which method of Phishing Credential Prevention? in Advanced Threat Prevention Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/which-method-of-phishing-credential-prevention/m-p/188001#M111</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We are currently using User-ID to map users to IP addresses.&amp;nbsp; It seems that there are three possible methods of preventing credentials from leaving a site, but I am not clear on which method is best.&amp;nbsp; What are other folks doing?&amp;nbsp; One of the methods involves spinning up a RODC, which seems to be the most accurate of the three methods, but there is cost with that one if you don't have licensing to cover that server.&amp;nbsp; It's also another server to keep patched, so there's an on-going cost with that method.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have the licensing to spin up a RODC server, but I'm not sure if the Pro's outweigh the Con's with that choice.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm interested in hearing what methods other people have used to implemented this very useful feature.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2017 16:48:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>brucegarlock</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-20T16:48:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Which method of Phishing Credential Prevention?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/which-method-of-phishing-credential-prevention/m-p/188001#M111</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are currently using User-ID to map users to IP addresses.&amp;nbsp; It seems that there are three possible methods of preventing credentials from leaving a site, but I am not clear on which method is best.&amp;nbsp; What are other folks doing?&amp;nbsp; One of the methods involves spinning up a RODC, which seems to be the most accurate of the three methods, but there is cost with that one if you don't have licensing to cover that server.&amp;nbsp; It's also another server to keep patched, so there's an on-going cost with that method.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have the licensing to spin up a RODC server, but I'm not sure if the Pro's outweigh the Con's with that choice.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm interested in hearing what methods other people have used to implemented this very useful feature.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2017 16:48:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/which-method-of-phishing-credential-prevention/m-p/188001#M111</guid>
      <dc:creator>brucegarlock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-20T16:48:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

