<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Protocol Protection Layer 2 or Vwire in Advanced Threat Prevention Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/protocol-protection-layer-2-or-vwire/m-p/190667#M121</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;My question would it be important to add protocol protection&amp;nbsp; in Zone Protection if you are running layer 2 or vwire on you palo alto fiewalll? and if so should it be placed&amp;nbsp; on untrust or trust or both?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 17:47:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AndyYerger</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-12-07T17:47:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Protocol Protection Layer 2 or Vwire</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/protocol-protection-layer-2-or-vwire/m-p/190667#M121</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My question would it be important to add protocol protection&amp;nbsp; in Zone Protection if you are running layer 2 or vwire on you palo alto fiewalll? and if so should it be placed&amp;nbsp; on untrust or trust or both?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 17:47:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/protocol-protection-layer-2-or-vwire/m-p/190667#M121</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndyYerger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-07T17:47:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Protocol Protection Layer 2 or Vwire</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/protocol-protection-layer-2-or-vwire/m-p/192156#M132</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So the short answer is it depends on your environment and policies. Here are my thoughts:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Protect as much as possible without compromising security or performance. I have a VWire that is protecting another device and I do have threat protection on it. This way the PAN can block/stop the traffic so the vwire device doesnt get hit with it. For me everything inbound gets this treatment, i.e. the border. Outbound traffic is a different story, some I do and some I dont. It protects not only me if a host is potentially compromised but also others so my potentially compromised host doesnt attack someone else.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope that makes sense.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 23:56:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/protocol-protection-layer-2-or-vwire/m-p/192156#M132</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-18T23:56:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Protocol Protection Layer 2 or Vwire</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/protocol-protection-layer-2-or-vwire/m-p/192365#M135</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply food for thought.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 23:43:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/protocol-protection-layer-2-or-vwire/m-p/192365#M135</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndyYerger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-19T23:43:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

