<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Is PAN AV and/or Wildfire capable of analysing docker image in Advanced Threat Prevention Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/is-pan-av-and-or-wildfire-capable-of-analysing-docker-image/m-p/431297#M1299</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have enabled SSL Decryption for almost all the web access of our users.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our devs are asking us to whitelist hub.docker.com, because it's anoying to put our internal CA in kubernetes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I get it, but there's multiple example of docker image who was Malicious.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wonder if our firewall is able to detect that the currently docker image that an user is downloading is Malicious.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Because, if it's not the case, decrypting hub.docker.com is pointless IMO.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Vincent&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 05:07:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>VincentCollier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-09-03T05:07:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is PAN AV and/or Wildfire capable of analysing docker image</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/is-pan-av-and-or-wildfire-capable-of-analysing-docker-image/m-p/431297#M1299</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have enabled SSL Decryption for almost all the web access of our users.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our devs are asking us to whitelist hub.docker.com, because it's anoying to put our internal CA in kubernetes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I get it, but there's multiple example of docker image who was Malicious.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wonder if our firewall is able to detect that the currently docker image that an user is downloading is Malicious.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Because, if it's not the case, decrypting hub.docker.com is pointless IMO.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Vincent&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 05:07:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/is-pan-av-and-or-wildfire-capable-of-analysing-docker-image/m-p/431297#M1299</guid>
      <dc:creator>VincentCollier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-03T05:07:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

