<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Minemeld &amp;amp; Log4j in Advanced Threat Prevention Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/minemeld-amp-log4j/m-p/453077#M1418</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;MineMeld doesn't use Java components so it's not affected by the&amp;nbsp;Log4j vulnerability.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 06:40:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ymiyashita</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-12-14T06:40:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Minemeld &amp; Log4j</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/minemeld-amp-log4j/m-p/453067#M1417</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is Minemeld affected by Log4j?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;I see Palo's Security Advisories about Log4j (&lt;A href="https://security.paloaltonetworks.com/CVE-2021-44228" target="_blank"&gt;https://security.paloaltonetworks.com/CVE-2021-44228&lt;/A&gt;) - but there is no Minemeld in it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is anybody out there, who can answer this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;roger&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 06:32:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/minemeld-amp-log4j/m-p/453067#M1417</guid>
      <dc:creator>r_buchwalder</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-14T06:32:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Minemeld &amp; Log4j</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/minemeld-amp-log4j/m-p/453077#M1418</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;MineMeld doesn't use Java components so it's not affected by the&amp;nbsp;Log4j vulnerability.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 06:40:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/minemeld-amp-log4j/m-p/453077#M1418</guid>
      <dc:creator>ymiyashita</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-14T06:40:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Minemeld &amp; Log4j</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/minemeld-amp-log4j/m-p/457771#M1458</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;One of our security scanners flags our minemeld box as being vulnerable, so even if it's not being actively used, there is still some java code that's present on the system.&amp;nbsp; So does anybody have any suggestions?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 13:19:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/minemeld-amp-log4j/m-p/457771#M1458</guid>
      <dc:creator>bwsaloum</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-10T13:19:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

