<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Test that a Threat Signature is Enabled? in Advanced Threat Prevention Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/test-that-a-threat-signature-is-enabled/m-p/244160#M479</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way of testing if a specific Threat Signature is enabled? I recently automated critical threat signatures. both vulnerabilities and anti-spyware, to be set to reset-both, but I want to make sure it is working and the new critical signatures are indeed enabled and ready to reset-both. I have done some random searches and haven't been able to find one that has been hit and I really don't want to take the wait and see approach here. &amp;nbsp;Thoughts?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kim&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 19:44:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kamorris</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-12-20T19:44:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Test that a Threat Signature is Enabled?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/test-that-a-threat-signature-is-enabled/m-p/244160#M479</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way of testing if a specific Threat Signature is enabled? I recently automated critical threat signatures. both vulnerabilities and anti-spyware, to be set to reset-both, but I want to make sure it is working and the new critical signatures are indeed enabled and ready to reset-both. I have done some random searches and haven't been able to find one that has been hit and I really don't want to take the wait and see approach here. &amp;nbsp;Thoughts?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kim&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 19:44:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/test-that-a-threat-signature-is-enabled/m-p/244160#M479</guid>
      <dc:creator>kamorris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-20T19:44:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Test that a Threat Signature is Enabled?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/test-that-a-threat-signature-is-enabled/m-p/244161#M480</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The best way to test it would be to run a pentest. Obtain the proof of concept (PoC) and run the exploit through the box. If it doesn't fire, that would be a great false negative finding and you should report it, providing a full client packet capture and details on the PoC to Palo Alto Networks Support, to review how the signature needs to be improved.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 19:55:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/test-that-a-threat-signature-is-enabled/m-p/244161#M480</guid>
      <dc:creator>mivaldi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-20T19:55:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

