<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Turn around time for test a site submision in Advanced Threat Prevention Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/turn-around-time-for-test-a-site-submision/m-p/307762#M734</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just checked and PAN does list this as a proxy avoidance site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;URL&lt;/STRONG&gt;: webrecorder.io/&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL class="list-unstyled query-result-ul"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Category&lt;/STRONG&gt;: Proxy Avoidance and Anonymizers&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 22:17:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-01-23T22:17:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Turn around time for test a site submision</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/turn-around-time-for-test-a-site-submision/m-p/307696#M733</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So As a network admin I was disappointed to see that Palo have marked this url as low risk :&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://webrecorder.io/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://webrecorder.io/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you do not block this site it allows your users to negate all of your well thought out url policies, yes they can just jump on a porn site and start streaming away.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I submitted the url to test a site a few days ago but still the url is marked as low risk - network admins - give it a go your be worryingly surprised by just how badly it rips a way around your filtering.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know i'm one little user but it has huge issues for passing through all those rules that have been carefully considered.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for reference I have requested it be marked as "proxy evasion" seems a reasonable fit but if not I hope palo can better fit it to another section.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 13:48:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/turn-around-time-for-test-a-site-submision/m-p/307696#M733</guid>
      <dc:creator>TerryBradford</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-23T13:48:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Turn around time for test a site submision</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/turn-around-time-for-test-a-site-submision/m-p/307762#M734</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just checked and PAN does list this as a proxy avoidance site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;URL&lt;/STRONG&gt;: webrecorder.io/&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL class="list-unstyled query-result-ul"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Category&lt;/STRONG&gt;: Proxy Avoidance and Anonymizers&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 22:17:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/advanced-threat-prevention/turn-around-time-for-test-a-site-submision/m-p/307762#M734</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-23T22:17:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

