<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic When web proxy will support XFF header insertion and web cache ? in Web Proxy Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/web-proxy-discussions/when-web-proxy-will-support-xff-header-insertion-and-web-cache/m-p/1236900#M63</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all, Now with explicit and transparent forward proxy support I see a need for X-Forwarded-For/Real-Client-IP header insertion support and a second place cache support. Palo Alto can insert the user id in a header for the backend server (&lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/11-1/pan-os-admin/user-id/user-id-concepts/user-mapping/username-header-insertion" target="_blank"&gt;Username Header Insertion&lt;/A&gt;) but why not the ip address &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":thinking_face:"&gt;🤔&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe before it was harder to extract layer ip address but as of now Palo Alto supports this&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/11-0/pan-os-new-features/content-inspection-features/support-for-custom-layer3-and-layer4-threat-signatures" target="_blank"&gt;Support for Custom Layer 3 and Layer 4 Threat Signatures&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the web cache this is secondary but still most web proxies do have it and as Palo Alto as a web proxy should be doing buffering of the traffic as to get the full HTTP request before sending it , it should be possible. Also I have not seen if there are system variables to control the buffering?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 07:12:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>nikoolayy1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-08-29T07:12:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>When web proxy will support XFF header insertion and web cache ?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/web-proxy-discussions/when-web-proxy-will-support-xff-header-insertion-and-web-cache/m-p/1236900#M63</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all, Now with explicit and transparent forward proxy support I see a need for X-Forwarded-For/Real-Client-IP header insertion support and a second place cache support. Palo Alto can insert the user id in a header for the backend server (&lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/11-1/pan-os-admin/user-id/user-id-concepts/user-mapping/username-header-insertion" target="_blank"&gt;Username Header Insertion&lt;/A&gt;) but why not the ip address &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":thinking_face:"&gt;🤔&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe before it was harder to extract layer ip address but as of now Palo Alto supports this&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/11-0/pan-os-new-features/content-inspection-features/support-for-custom-layer3-and-layer4-threat-signatures" target="_blank"&gt;Support for Custom Layer 3 and Layer 4 Threat Signatures&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the web cache this is secondary but still most web proxies do have it and as Palo Alto as a web proxy should be doing buffering of the traffic as to get the full HTTP request before sending it , it should be possible. Also I have not seen if there are system variables to control the buffering?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 07:12:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/web-proxy-discussions/when-web-proxy-will-support-xff-header-insertion-and-web-cache/m-p/1236900#M63</guid>
      <dc:creator>nikoolayy1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-29T07:12:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: When web proxy will support XFF header insertion and web cache ?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/web-proxy-discussions/when-web-proxy-will-support-xff-header-insertion-and-web-cache/m-p/1243178#M65</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Did you get any updates on this? are we supporting this feature / on roadmap?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 19:51:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/web-proxy-discussions/when-web-proxy-will-support-xff-header-insertion-and-web-cache/m-p/1243178#M65</guid>
      <dc:creator>mahmad.naviwala</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-04T19:51:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

