<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: If Vwire is transparent, then why do you have to specify which VLANs are allowed through? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/if-vwire-is-transparent-then-why-do-you-have-to-specify-which/m-p/13721#M10059</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's still stateful, you'll need to either allow all VLANs to make it transparent (agnostic) or individual ones.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;All the firewall is always stateful if you put it inline it will still drop out of window or out of sync packets (asymmetric routing).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 23:52:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>amansour</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-07T23:52:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>If Vwire is transparent, then why do you have to specify which VLANs are allowed through?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/if-vwire-is-transparent-then-why-do-you-have-to-specify-which/m-p/13720#M10058</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I usually just open up the range of vlans from 1-4094...but why do this is it's meant to be transparent?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 23:48:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/if-vwire-is-transparent-then-why-do-you-have-to-specify-which/m-p/13720#M10058</guid>
      <dc:creator>Abs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-07T23:48:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: If Vwire is transparent, then why do you have to specify which VLANs are allowed through?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/if-vwire-is-transparent-then-why-do-you-have-to-specify-which/m-p/13721#M10059</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's still stateful, you'll need to either allow all VLANs to make it transparent (agnostic) or individual ones.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;All the firewall is always stateful if you put it inline it will still drop out of window or out of sync packets (asymmetric routing).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 23:52:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/if-vwire-is-transparent-then-why-do-you-have-to-specify-which/m-p/13721#M10059</guid>
      <dc:creator>amansour</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-07T23:52:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: If Vwire is transparent, then why do you have to specify which VLANs are allowed through?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/if-vwire-is-transparent-then-why-do-you-have-to-specify-which/m-p/13722#M10060</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I recommendation that you define vlans 0-4094 to include vlan 0, the native vlan. Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 23:58:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/if-vwire-is-transparent-then-why-do-you-have-to-specify-which/m-p/13722#M10060</guid>
      <dc:creator>rmonvon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-07T23:58:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

