<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Active cluster in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/active-cluster/m-p/452523#M101259</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Try sourcing the panorama connections from a unique IP per peer, as the VIP ip will likely always be routed to one of the peers, meaning it would break tcp originating from the other peer&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2021 09:10:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-12-10T09:10:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Active cluster</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/active-cluster/m-p/451163#M101123</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a customer having Active /active cluster .&amp;nbsp; The Panorama lies in another country : The nodes of cluster use the traffic interface ( and not management interface)to reach Panorama , and at firewall we do the NAT , so that on Panorama&amp;nbsp; natted IP is visible&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But for some reason , we only see 1 node connected and 2nd one disconnected . As active /active cluster has a VIP , is it normal that only 1 node visible on Panorama ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 07:27:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/active-cluster/m-p/451163#M101123</guid>
      <dc:creator>FWPalolearner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-03T07:27:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Active cluster</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/active-cluster/m-p/452523#M101259</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Try sourcing the panorama connections from a unique IP per peer, as the VIP ip will likely always be routed to one of the peers, meaning it would break tcp originating from the other peer&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2021 09:10:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/active-cluster/m-p/452523#M101259</guid>
      <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-10T09:10:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

