<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: aggregate interface in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/aggregate-interface/m-p/459790#M102045</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/200040"&gt;@GnContente&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have the option "Enable in HA Passive State" enabled. Each of the nodes has a dedicated port-channel (per firewall ae) on the switch.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you share a port-channel with both nodes, then the fail over (measured on how long there is no traffic) will take much longer.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 12:44:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JoergSchuetter</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-01-20T12:44:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>aggregate interface</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/aggregate-interface/m-p/459740#M102044</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would like to have the community opinion on two different setups and which one is the recommended by PA, i have looked for documentation about this and i cannot find a straight answer. All i could find was:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA14u0000008V36CAE&amp;amp;lang=en_US%E2%80%A9" target="_self"&gt;https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA14u0000008V36CAE&amp;amp;lang=en_US%E2%80%A9&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This document states, if i am interpreting it correctly that i should disable the option "&lt;SPAN&gt;Enable in HA Passive State" has this option from my understading is to be used for AE interfaces between firewalls, and causes issues on downstream AE interfaces.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On my setup I have two firewalls in HA that connect to a downstream switch.&amp;nbsp;What would be the best approach?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;To configure a port-channel&amp;nbsp; for each firewall on the downstream switch without having to worry if the "&lt;SPAN&gt;Enable in HA Passive State&lt;/SPAN&gt;" is checked or unchecked. If so what would be consequences of this configurations in terms of traffic forwarding since the two port-channels on the switch will be up.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Or is to configure one unique port-channel&amp;nbsp;on the downstream switch and uncheck the "&lt;SPAN&gt;Enable in HA Passive State&lt;/SPAN&gt;"?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;TIA&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 11:24:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/aggregate-interface/m-p/459740#M102044</guid>
      <dc:creator>GnContente</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-20T11:24:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: aggregate interface</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/aggregate-interface/m-p/459790#M102045</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/200040"&gt;@GnContente&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have the option "Enable in HA Passive State" enabled. Each of the nodes has a dedicated port-channel (per firewall ae) on the switch.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you share a port-channel with both nodes, then the fail over (measured on how long there is no traffic) will take much longer.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 12:44:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/aggregate-interface/m-p/459790#M102045</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoergSchuetter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-20T12:44:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: aggregate interface</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/aggregate-interface/m-p/459797#M102046</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/83320"&gt;@JoergSchuetter&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for replying, if i have a port-channel for each firewall on the downstream switch, i do not fully grasp why do i need "Enable in HA Passive State"?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;TIA&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV class="lia-message-author-with-avatar"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 13:35:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/aggregate-interface/m-p/459797#M102046</guid>
      <dc:creator>GnContente</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-20T13:35:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: aggregate interface</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/aggregate-interface/m-p/459881#M102047</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This flag ensures that L2 is up all the time.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If that wouldn't be the case, then the node needs to bring up the channel (plus L2). This takes a while (up to a few seconds).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If the port-channel and L2 are kept up (but simply not presenting the relevant MAC), it's just a matter of fraction of a second to have it fully active.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 17:29:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/aggregate-interface/m-p/459881#M102047</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoergSchuetter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-20T17:29:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

