<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: destination port in PBF in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/destination-port-in-pbf/m-p/462656#M102287</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello there.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you match only on port 80, you will be matching 1930 applications.&amp;nbsp; I need to ask the question.. WHY?&amp;nbsp; &lt;BR /&gt;PBF is used to supercede the routing table.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;BR /&gt;Do you have more than one ISP? &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What is the business justification, as we would probably NOT recommend this, as it will probably not work as expected.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 02:22:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>S.Cantwell</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-02-02T02:22:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>destination port in PBF</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/destination-port-in-pbf/m-p/462433#M102264</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is there an option to define destination port in PBF. Now if a service is selected, PA applies PBF if source or destination has that port.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am looking for a PBF which should match only if destination port is 80.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2022 12:16:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/destination-port-in-pbf/m-p/462433#M102264</guid>
      <dc:creator>ceapen01</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-01T12:16:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: destination port in PBF</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/destination-port-in-pbf/m-p/462655#M102286</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/177752"&gt;@ceapen01&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When you specify the service in a PBF that refers to the destination service (or port), not the source service/port. PBF wouldn't really be a lot of good in a lot of cases if the service object was applied to both source and destination.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 02:22:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/destination-port-in-pbf/m-p/462655#M102286</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-02T02:22:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: destination port in PBF</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/destination-port-in-pbf/m-p/462656#M102287</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello there.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you match only on port 80, you will be matching 1930 applications.&amp;nbsp; I need to ask the question.. WHY?&amp;nbsp; &lt;BR /&gt;PBF is used to supercede the routing table.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;BR /&gt;Do you have more than one ISP? &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What is the business justification, as we would probably NOT recommend this, as it will probably not work as expected.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 02:22:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/destination-port-in-pbf/m-p/462656#M102287</guid>
      <dc:creator>S.Cantwell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-02T02:22:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: destination port in PBF</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/destination-port-in-pbf/m-p/462705#M102290</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/113304"&gt;@S.Cantwell&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/43480"&gt;@BPry&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/43480"&gt;@BPry&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;I checked the session id details. PBF was being used even when source port is 80. Attached screenshot below.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="port80.JPG" style="width: 590px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/38944i63140C839061CFF5/image-size/large/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="port80.JPG" alt="port80.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/113304"&gt;@S.Cantwell&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;i have added a scenario diagram below. PBF requirement is to route incoming web requests to 10.20.30.12 via INT 2. The DNAT for public IP has a source NAT with INT 2 interface IP, so that DC firewall sees source IP as PA FW INT 2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="scenario.JPG" style="width: 910px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/38945i94F7E52518DC69AB/image-size/large/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="scenario.JPG" alt="scenario.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 05:30:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/destination-port-in-pbf/m-p/462705#M102290</guid>
      <dc:creator>ceapen01</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-02T05:30:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

