<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Is it recommended to use Loopback interface as a source in path monitoring ? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-it-recommended-to-use-loopback-interface-as-a-source-in-path/m-p/474138#M103348</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to configure a path based monitoring for a static route on a virtual router X, now on the VR X, there is multiple interfaces, is it usually recommended to use one of the interfaces IP address as a source address for the monitoring rule when pinging google or better to create a loopback on that VR and use that instead.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 19:52:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bambox</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-03-17T19:52:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is it recommended to use Loopback interface as a source in path monitoring ?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-it-recommended-to-use-loopback-interface-as-a-source-in-path/m-p/474138#M103348</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to configure a path based monitoring for a static route on a virtual router X, now on the VR X, there is multiple interfaces, is it usually recommended to use one of the interfaces IP address as a source address for the monitoring rule when pinging google or better to create a loopback on that VR and use that instead.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 19:52:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-it-recommended-to-use-loopback-interface-as-a-source-in-path/m-p/474138#M103348</guid>
      <dc:creator>bambox</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-17T19:52:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it recommended to use Loopback interface as a source in path monitoring ?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-it-recommended-to-use-loopback-interface-as-a-source-in-path/m-p/474438#M103367</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/170835"&gt;@bambox&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't&amp;nbsp; believe you actually have an option. Path monitor will use ip address assigned to the outbound interface that will be used to reach the destination network from that route.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2022 14:15:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-it-recommended-to-use-loopback-interface-as-a-source-in-path/m-p/474438#M103367</guid>
      <dc:creator>aleksandar.astardzhiev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-19T14:15:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

