<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Leak a specific route from BGP summarization in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/leak-a-specific-route-from-bgp-summarization/m-p/478710#M103799</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Just to make sure we understand, do you have the /16 configured in the aggregate tab?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you tried adding the /32 to a redist rule? You would probably need to add that to your export rules unless you don't have an exact match on the /16.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 18:17:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rmfalconer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-04-06T18:17:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Leak a specific route from BGP summarization</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/leak-a-specific-route-from-bgp-summarization/m-p/478372#M103747</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="2"&gt;Hello All,&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="2"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have a question related to BGP summarization in a PAN firewall. We currently have summary aggregate advertised to the upstream device. But now we need a leak /32 route to the upstream along with the original summary route. What is the best method to achieve this goal? I have seen an option for 'Advertise filter' in BGP summary. If I add the /32 there, will it result in /32 and the /16&amp;nbsp;route(summary) being&amp;nbsp;sent to upstream?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 15:18:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/leak-a-specific-route-from-bgp-summarization/m-p/478372#M103747</guid>
      <dc:creator>a-techie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-05T15:18:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Leak a specific route from BGP summarization</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/leak-a-specific-route-from-bgp-summarization/m-p/478387#M103748</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/187237"&gt;@a-techie&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The summarized route is originating from PAN firewall (to receive specific routes and advertise summarized route) or you receive the summarized route from neighbour device?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What about the /32 host route - do you want to originate from PAN firewall, or you receive it from somewhere else along the summary route?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 15:49:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/leak-a-specific-route-from-bgp-summarization/m-p/478387#M103748</guid>
      <dc:creator>aleksandar.astardzhiev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-05T15:49:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Leak a specific route from BGP summarization</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/leak-a-specific-route-from-bgp-summarization/m-p/478410#M103752</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/70130"&gt;@aleksandar.astardzhiev&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;PAN is originating the the summarized /16 route(contributing routes coming from neighbours for this /16) and PAN receives /32 route from a neighbour. That /32 falls in the range of the /16 the PAN is originating and thus it get masked.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 17:11:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/leak-a-specific-route-from-bgp-summarization/m-p/478410#M103752</guid>
      <dc:creator>a-techie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-05T17:11:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Leak a specific route from BGP summarization</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/leak-a-specific-route-from-bgp-summarization/m-p/478624#M103790</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Any help on this would be appreciated!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 12:21:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/leak-a-specific-route-from-bgp-summarization/m-p/478624#M103790</guid>
      <dc:creator>a-techie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-06T12:21:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Leak a specific route from BGP summarization</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/leak-a-specific-route-from-bgp-summarization/m-p/478710#M103799</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Just to make sure we understand, do you have the /16 configured in the aggregate tab?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you tried adding the /32 to a redist rule? You would probably need to add that to your export rules unless you don't have an exact match on the /16.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 18:17:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/leak-a-specific-route-from-bgp-summarization/m-p/478710#M103799</guid>
      <dc:creator>rmfalconer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-06T18:17:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

