<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: GlobalProtect client in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/globalprotect-client/m-p/14175#M10414</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, Cisco's tunnel group and group policies cannot directly migrated into PA Global Protect gateway. The rule is a single PSK/CERT group per GP gateway, once you need more a new gateway has to be created.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In Cisco vision the use of multiple vpn-group was done to segregate traffic in layer3+ pool containers, using PA and its user identification, always present in GP, you can achieve the same security level with only one gateway (and related tunnel group) with a bunch of security rules based on User-ID.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 11:42:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>NGS_SOC</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-05-19T11:42:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>GlobalProtect client</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/globalprotect-client/m-p/14174#M10413</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12pt;"&gt;Hi&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12pt;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12pt;"&gt;Any one familiar with Cisco's ipsec vpn-groups ? just wanted to find out how the concept can be implemented with PA.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12pt;"&gt;Regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12pt;"&gt;Darlington&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 16:14:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/globalprotect-client/m-p/14174#M10413</guid>
      <dc:creator>dmoyo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-16T16:14:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GlobalProtect client</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/globalprotect-client/m-p/14175#M10414</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, Cisco's tunnel group and group policies cannot directly migrated into PA Global Protect gateway. The rule is a single PSK/CERT group per GP gateway, once you need more a new gateway has to be created.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In Cisco vision the use of multiple vpn-group was done to segregate traffic in layer3+ pool containers, using PA and its user identification, always present in GP, you can achieve the same security level with only one gateway (and related tunnel group) with a bunch of security rules based on User-ID.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 11:42:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/globalprotect-client/m-p/14175#M10414</guid>
      <dc:creator>NGS_SOC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-19T11:42:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

