<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Redistribution host address between protocols in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/redistribution-host-address-between-protocols/m-p/482215#M104258</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot, Pavel.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Understand. L&lt;SPAN&gt;oopback interface of Firewall can't be redistributed as learned route by dynamic route protocol like cisco. Actually, I can advertise both lookback addresses into RIP and OSPF area&amp;nbsp;in parallel and don't need worry about conflict issue.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 01:13:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DexinLi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-04-25T01:13:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Redistribution host address between protocols</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/redistribution-host-address-between-protocols/m-p/481992#M104229</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear experts&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I set a PA firewall as an ASBR, connects to a RIP and a OSPF area with eth1/1 and eth1/2 respectively. And created 2 loopback interfaces on PA, advertised them into RIP and OSPF respectively. Then I can reach them within RIP and OSPF area separately. Now I create redistribution profiles RIP-2-OSPF and OSPF-2-RIP, and apply them to OSPF and RIP. Finally, I only can reach the loopback address on cisco routers in two areas each other, but can't see the loopback address on PA. That is to say, I can't reach any PA's /32 host address which is advertised in RIP AS from OSPF and vice versa. Why? Any setting is missed by me? Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2022 14:58:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/redistribution-host-address-between-protocols/m-p/481992#M104229</guid>
      <dc:creator>DexinLi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-22T14:58:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Redistribution host address between protocols</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/redistribution-host-address-between-protocols/m-p/482135#M104244</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/217208"&gt;@DexinLi&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Assuming that you're testing via ICMP, do you have an interface mgmt profile assigned that actually allows ICMP from the host you are testing from? Without a management profile assigned on the loopback interface the interface would appear to be unreachable.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2022 07:37:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/redistribution-host-address-between-protocols/m-p/482135#M104244</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-23T07:37:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Redistribution host address between protocols</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/redistribution-host-address-between-protocols/m-p/482168#M104253</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you so much, Gentlemen,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;for your prompt reply&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let me illustrate my question with below diagram.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Loopback0 is advertised into RIP and pingable from R1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Loopback1 is advertised into OSPF and pingable from R2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do redistribute between RIP and OSPF.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Loopback address of R1 is reachable from R2 and Loopback address of R2 is also reachable from R1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But Loopback0 of firewall can't reach from R2 and Loopback1 of firewall can't reach from R1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's to say, loopback address of firewall can't be redistributed between protocols. Why?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I test the same situation on cisco router, there's no problem. Any special settings is needed? Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="DexinLi_1-1650763526604.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/40277i1BE0576FE8531EA7/image-size/medium/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="DexinLi_1-1650763526604.png" alt="DexinLi_1-1650763526604.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2022 01:35:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/redistribution-host-address-between-protocols/m-p/482168#M104253</guid>
      <dc:creator>DexinLi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-24T01:35:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Redistribution host address between protocols</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/redistribution-host-address-between-protocols/m-p/482195#M104256</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the post&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/217208"&gt;@DexinLi&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if you are trying to redistribute loopback interface of the Firewall, then it is redistribution of connected route and not RIP/OSPF learned route. I would try to configure 2 redistribution profiles under: Network &amp;gt; Virtual Router &amp;gt; [VR name] &amp;gt; Redistribution Profile&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;then create one for Loopback.1 (select source type: connect and select: Redist) and another one for Loopback.0&amp;nbsp;(select source type: connect and select: Redist).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Finally, I would redistribute profile for Loopback.1 into RIP and&amp;nbsp;Loopback.0 into OSPF.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can confirm result by checking routing table of R1 and R2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pavel&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2022 22:41:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/redistribution-host-address-between-protocols/m-p/482195#M104256</guid>
      <dc:creator>PavelK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-24T22:41:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Redistribution host address between protocols</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/redistribution-host-address-between-protocols/m-p/482215#M104258</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot, Pavel.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Understand. L&lt;SPAN&gt;oopback interface of Firewall can't be redistributed as learned route by dynamic route protocol like cisco. Actually, I can advertise both lookback addresses into RIP and OSPF area&amp;nbsp;in parallel and don't need worry about conflict issue.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 01:13:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/redistribution-host-address-between-protocols/m-p/482215#M104258</guid>
      <dc:creator>DexinLi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-25T01:13:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

