<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: High Availability - Passive Link State in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability-passive-link-state/m-p/486699#M104631</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Just to agree with &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/192693"&gt;@PavelK&lt;/a&gt;, for our deployments before initiating test failovers we start a ping -t to an interface that will respond to ping. Then, we initiate the failover - we aim for a single missed ping for "auto"-based failovers and three missed pings for "shutdown"-based failovers.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 09:15:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>KieraMitchell</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-05-12T09:15:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>High Availability - Passive Link State</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability-passive-link-state/m-p/486033#M104571</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Team,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Trust all is well. IN the documents it is only mentioned that the "Auto" link-state makes the convergence faster but it is not mentioned how much faster, for example in the number of seconds. From the guide:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Set the Passive link state to "&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Auto&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;".&amp;nbsp;Auto&amp;nbsp;setting will bring the interfaces on the passive firewall to UP physical state, the interface will not pass any data traffic.&amp;nbsp; This facilitates faster failover times.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have an idea how much faster it becomes by changing the link state from shutdown to auto?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Many thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2022 08:19:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability-passive-link-state/m-p/486033#M104571</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hamid.Saffarzadeh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-10T08:19:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Availability - Passive Link State</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability-passive-link-state/m-p/486057#M104572</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the post&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/129823"&gt;@Hamid.Saffarzadeh&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;based on my experience with Passive Link State set to "auto" the convergence is approximately 1 second or less with "shutdown" it is in the range 3 to 5 seconds.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pavel&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2022 09:59:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability-passive-link-state/m-p/486057#M104572</guid>
      <dc:creator>PavelK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-10T09:59:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Availability - Passive Link State</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability-passive-link-state/m-p/486647#M104624</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you Pavel,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;One more question if you don't mind. Do you have any idea How long it takes for BGP to converge at the time of a manual firewall failover?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 08:15:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability-passive-link-state/m-p/486647#M104624</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hamid.Saffarzadeh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-12T08:15:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Availability - Passive Link State</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability-passive-link-state/m-p/486699#M104631</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Just to agree with &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/192693"&gt;@PavelK&lt;/a&gt;, for our deployments before initiating test failovers we start a ping -t to an interface that will respond to ping. Then, we initiate the failover - we aim for a single missed ping for "auto"-based failovers and three missed pings for "shutdown"-based failovers.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 09:15:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability-passive-link-state/m-p/486699#M104631</guid>
      <dc:creator>KieraMitchell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-12T09:15:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Availability - Passive Link State</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability-passive-link-state/m-p/486755#M104644</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/129823"&gt;@Hamid.Saffarzadeh&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;when it comes to BGP convergence during failover, then it is fairly quick. It is approximately 1 second or less.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pavel&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 13:01:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability-passive-link-state/m-p/486755#M104644</guid>
      <dc:creator>PavelK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-12T13:01:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

