<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Static Route Question in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/static-route-question/m-p/487995#M104772</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes correct, &amp;nbsp;thanks for clarifying thought it may cause some asymmetric routing issues. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;So there is no need to add an explicit static route to forward traffic for 10.20.50.x out from 1/6?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In terms of keeping lab traffic isolated is this in principle fine to use the /24 in the same ip range?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2022 21:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MistryJa</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-05-17T21:46:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Static Route Question</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/static-route-question/m-p/487954#M104764</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I just have a question about static routing on the palo alto and how it deals with traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We one VR and a default network route to send traffic for 10.20.0.0/16 out via ethernet 1/5 , zone core. &amp;nbsp; There is another interface 1/6 configured with 10.20.50.1/24 zone lab.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the lan by default all traffic get sent to the firewall. &amp;nbsp; Outbound traffic is going out to internet fine via zone lab.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is there likely to be any issues with this routing configuration ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2022 20:49:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/static-route-question/m-p/487954#M104764</guid>
      <dc:creator>MistryJa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-17T20:49:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Static Route Question</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/static-route-question/m-p/487968#M104767</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Are you asking if the 10.20/16 route will somehow affect the routing to 10.20.50.0/24? It won't impact due to the lab zone having a more specific prefix.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2022 21:11:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/static-route-question/m-p/487968#M104767</guid>
      <dc:creator>rmfalconer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-17T21:11:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Static Route Question</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/static-route-question/m-p/487995#M104772</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes correct, &amp;nbsp;thanks for clarifying thought it may cause some asymmetric routing issues. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;So there is no need to add an explicit static route to forward traffic for 10.20.50.x out from 1/6?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In terms of keeping lab traffic isolated is this in principle fine to use the /24 in the same ip range?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2022 21:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/static-route-question/m-p/487995#M104772</guid>
      <dc:creator>MistryJa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-17T21:46:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Static Route Question</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/static-route-question/m-p/488058#M104777</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No need for a static route as long as the network is just that /24. The connected interface will be used for that subnet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I'm doing a lab or other space that is completely separate, I use different IP space. Maybe a 172.16 so that it's clearly differentiated from anything production. But it's fine to carve out space from a larger block if you're comfortable with it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 03:14:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/static-route-question/m-p/488058#M104777</guid>
      <dc:creator>rmfalconer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-18T03:14:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

