<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic UniDirectional Link Failure Detection without UDLD in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/unidirectional-link-failure-detection-without-udld/m-p/14451#M10629</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know the network appliance could detect uni-directional link failure of SFP+ without UDLD?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried the test with PA-5060 and Juniper-EX,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but SFP+s kept link-up cause TX might continue to shot laser when RX came not to receive laser from peer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I though it is general problem as SFP+ and UDLD has been defined.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But our customer said it could detect uni-directional link failure between Juniper SRX and Cisco ASA without UDLD.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure how those FWs could detect it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you please tell me if you know a helpful knowledge?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 06:50:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>komure</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-02-05T06:50:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>UniDirectional Link Failure Detection without UDLD</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/unidirectional-link-failure-detection-without-udld/m-p/14451#M10629</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know the network appliance could detect uni-directional link failure of SFP+ without UDLD?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried the test with PA-5060 and Juniper-EX,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but SFP+s kept link-up cause TX might continue to shot laser when RX came not to receive laser from peer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I though it is general problem as SFP+ and UDLD has been defined.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But our customer said it could detect uni-directional link failure between Juniper SRX and Cisco ASA without UDLD.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure how those FWs could detect it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you please tell me if you know a helpful knowledge?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 06:50:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/unidirectional-link-failure-detection-without-udld/m-p/14451#M10629</guid>
      <dc:creator>komure</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-05T06:50:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UniDirectional Link Failure Detection without UDLD</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/unidirectional-link-failure-detection-without-udld/m-p/14452#M10630</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Komure,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not quite sure what's your questions is.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As of my understanding UDLD is cisco propreitary protocol.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hari Yadavalli&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 15:04:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/unidirectional-link-failure-detection-without-udld/m-p/14452#M10630</guid>
      <dc:creator>hyadavalli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-05T15:04:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

