<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Global protect on the same interface with another public IP address in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-on-the-same-interface-with-another-public-ip/m-p/516367#M107232</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I did this with loopback interfaces. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I already had a physical interface in the public zone, so adding loopback interfaces in the same zone and IP address space "just worked".&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2022 13:50:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>magates</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-09-29T13:50:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Global protect on the same interface with another public IP address</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-on-the-same-interface-with-another-public-ip/m-p/516363#M107229</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is one of the requirements for globalProtect .&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Already a globalProtect tunnel running an external interface with one public IP address.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now want to create an additional globalProtect tunnel configure on the same interface with another public IP address.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Both IP addresses are configured under one external interface. So please let me know if this kind of configuration is possible and will be valid or not.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2022 13:33:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-on-the-same-interface-with-another-public-ip/m-p/516363#M107229</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mohammed_Yasin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-29T13:33:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Global protect on the same interface with another public IP address</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-on-the-same-interface-with-another-public-ip/m-p/516367#M107232</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I did this with loopback interfaces. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I already had a physical interface in the public zone, so adding loopback interfaces in the same zone and IP address space "just worked".&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2022 13:50:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-on-the-same-interface-with-another-public-ip/m-p/516367#M107232</guid>
      <dc:creator>magates</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-29T13:50:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Global protect on the same interface with another public IP address</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-on-the-same-interface-with-another-public-ip/m-p/516368#M107233</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the response,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Could I get more details or steps to reach the goal?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2022 13:52:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-on-the-same-interface-with-another-public-ip/m-p/516368#M107233</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mohammed_Yasin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-29T13:52:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

