<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: RTCP issue for matching policy in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/rtcp-issue-for-matching-policy/m-p/518237#M107527</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What code version are you running? I have some 5220's running 10.1.6-H3 and am seeing the same issue. Think its a bug and waiting another week to go to 10.1.7.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/content/dam/techdocs/en_US/pdf/pan-os/10-1/pan-os-release-notes/pan-os-release-notes.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/content/dam/techdocs/en_US/pdf/pan-os/10-1/pan-os-release-notes/pan-os-release-notes.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 16:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-10-18T16:23:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RTCP issue for matching policy</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/rtcp-issue-for-matching-policy/m-p/517747#M107430</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We are having a issue with RTCP traffic. The RTCP traffic is jumping the rule configured for this and matching the last rule (bypass).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The filter for the correct rule is application rtcp. We see that the application is identified but sometime is matching the correct and most of the times the last rule.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I attach the screenshots with the logs.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;what could be the reason? Its not about the first packet is taking the less restrictive rule because the app is being identified in all the moment,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Please note you are posting a public message where community members and experts can provide assistance. Sharing private information such as serial numbers or company information is not recommended.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Please note you are posting a public message where community members and experts can provide assistance. Sharing private information such as serial numbers or company information is not recommended.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 08:46:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/rtcp-issue-for-matching-policy/m-p/517747#M107430</guid>
      <dc:creator>BigPalo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-13T08:46:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RTCP issue for matching policy</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/rtcp-issue-for-matching-policy/m-p/517794#M107434</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/85066"&gt;@BigPalo&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So even though RTCP is documented as udp/dyanmic, I've had similar issues when using application-default instead of any or a custom service range. I'd test if you get the same behavior setting the RTCP traffic to use any service to your telco host(s). If you have anything other than RTP/RTCP traffic in this rule I'd personally separate the traffic out so that only RTP/RTCP isn't limited to application-default.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 14:52:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/rtcp-issue-for-matching-policy/m-p/517794#M107434</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-13T14:52:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RTCP issue for matching policy</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/rtcp-issue-for-matching-policy/m-p/518089#M107484</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We already tried to put "any" in service (not app-deafult) but the some sessions are jumping the rule.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 12:03:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/rtcp-issue-for-matching-policy/m-p/518089#M107484</guid>
      <dc:creator>BigPalo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-17T12:03:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RTCP issue for matching policy</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/rtcp-issue-for-matching-policy/m-p/518204#M107517</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;any idea&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 08:19:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/rtcp-issue-for-matching-policy/m-p/518204#M107517</guid>
      <dc:creator>BigPalo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-18T08:19:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RTCP issue for matching policy</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/rtcp-issue-for-matching-policy/m-p/518237#M107527</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What code version are you running? I have some 5220's running 10.1.6-H3 and am seeing the same issue. Think its a bug and waiting another week to go to 10.1.7.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/content/dam/techdocs/en_US/pdf/pan-os/10-1/pan-os-release-notes/pan-os-release-notes.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/content/dam/techdocs/en_US/pdf/pan-os/10-1/pan-os-release-notes/pan-os-release-notes.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 16:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/rtcp-issue-for-matching-policy/m-p/518237#M107527</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-18T16:23:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RTCP issue for matching policy</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/rtcp-issue-for-matching-policy/m-p/518317#M107535</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do you have the bugID for this issue? i would need to confirm it. thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2022 07:54:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/rtcp-issue-for-matching-policy/m-p/518317#M107535</guid>
      <dc:creator>BigPalo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-19T07:54:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RTCP issue for matching policy</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/rtcp-issue-for-matching-policy/m-p/518366#M107550</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I do not. I have a case opened however. Will check to see if 10.1.7 resolves the issue.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2022 14:23:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/rtcp-issue-for-matching-policy/m-p/518366#M107550</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-19T14:23:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RTCP issue for matching policy</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/rtcp-issue-for-matching-policy/m-p/518724#M107588</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I read the release notes for 10.1.7 and there is a fix for the following:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;TABLE class="table colsep rowsep  table-striped"&gt;
&lt;TBODY class="tbody"&gt;
&lt;TR class="row rowsep"&gt;
&lt;TD class="entry"&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class="p"&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;PAN-194408&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD class="entry relcol"&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class="p"&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Fixed an issue where, when policy rules had the apps that implicitly depended on web browsing configured with the service&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="term" title="" href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-1/pan-os-release-notes/pan-os-10-1-7-known-and-addressed-issues/pan-os-10-1-7-addressed-issues#" target="_self" data-scope="" data-format="dita" data-type=""&gt;application default&lt;/A&gt;, traffic did not match the rule correctly.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;/TBODY&gt;
&lt;/TABLE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Not sure if its the issue you are facing, but worth a read.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 14:11:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/rtcp-issue-for-matching-policy/m-p/518724#M107588</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-21T14:11:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

