<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Risky For Use Public IP as Private IP Security Concerned in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/risky-for-use-public-ip-as-private-ip-security-concerned/m-p/530412#M109454</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/11943"&gt;@kiwi&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; I understood about fundamental we should be&amp;nbsp; NAT for Private but I would like to know about risk in case&amp;nbsp; that we use The Public IP subnet not following RFC1918 will more security concern or not&amp;nbsp; because we will convince to change&amp;nbsp; subnet as following RFC1918&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2023 02:23:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Pattarachai-FTH</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-02-09T02:23:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Risky For Use Public IP as Private IP Security Concerned</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/risky-for-use-public-ip-as-private-ip-security-concerned/m-p/530234#M109424</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Expert ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please help to clarify that about risky for use Public IP as Private IP on Local Network due to we have plan to cut off the new network and existing network we use subnet like public subnet&amp;nbsp; we would like to defend that to change it about security concern to use public ip as private ip&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 02:51:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/risky-for-use-public-ip-as-private-ip-security-concerned/m-p/530234#M109424</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pattarachai-FTH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-08T02:51:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Risky For Use Public IP as Private IP Security Concerned</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/risky-for-use-public-ip-as-private-ip-security-concerned/m-p/530277#M109434</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/261687"&gt;@Pattarachai-FTH&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="ILfuVd"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hgKElc"&gt;Using a private IP address is definitely more secure than using a public IP address. In addition you will save on valuable address space using private IP addresses.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="ILfuVd"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hgKElc"&gt;Private addresses are not directly reachable over the internet and can only be reached using NAT.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="ILfuVd"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hgKElc"&gt;Please check &lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-1/pan-os-networking-admin/nat/nat-configuration-examples" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;NAT configuration examples&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt; or check &lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-1/pan-os-networking-admin/nat/configure-nat" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;various aspects of NAT&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="ILfuVd"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hgKElc"&gt;Kind regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="ILfuVd"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hgKElc"&gt;-Kiwi.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV id="ConnectiveDocSignExtentionInstalled" data-extension-version="1.0.4"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 10:07:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/risky-for-use-public-ip-as-private-ip-security-concerned/m-p/530277#M109434</guid>
      <dc:creator>kiwi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-08T10:07:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Risky For Use Public IP as Private IP Security Concerned</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/risky-for-use-public-ip-as-private-ip-security-concerned/m-p/530412#M109454</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/11943"&gt;@kiwi&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; I understood about fundamental we should be&amp;nbsp; NAT for Private but I would like to know about risk in case&amp;nbsp; that we use The Public IP subnet not following RFC1918 will more security concern or not&amp;nbsp; because we will convince to change&amp;nbsp; subnet as following RFC1918&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2023 02:23:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/risky-for-use-public-ip-as-private-ip-security-concerned/m-p/530412#M109454</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pattarachai-FTH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-09T02:23:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

