<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Replace Local Firewall object (address) with Panorama pushed object? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/replace-local-firewall-object-address-with-panorama-pushed/m-p/532563#M109781</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/226935"&gt;@JesseLeiker&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What is your process to migrate the firewalls?&amp;nbsp; Generally speaking, if NGFWs will be managed by Panorama, you don't want to create very many local policies and objects.&amp;nbsp; You can migrate the 3rd party firewall configs directly to Panorama.&amp;nbsp; I am curious if it is not too late to change the process.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 22:01:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TomYoung</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-02-28T22:01:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Replace Local Firewall object (address) with Panorama pushed object?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/replace-local-firewall-object-address-with-panorama-pushed/m-p/532525#M109777</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So we are migrating ASA's to Palo Alto...like TONS of them.&amp;nbsp; My question is quite simple and I've yet been able to find an answer.&amp;nbsp; Lets use the following for theoreticals:&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Local Firewall A has an address-group of "g-RFC1918" on it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;I've defined "g-RFC1918" as a Shared object for my Device Group: "Local Firewalls"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Upon a push I get the following response:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV id="ext-comp-3784" class=" x-panel"&gt;
&lt;DIV id="ext-gen8798" class="x-panel-bwrap"&gt;
&lt;DIV id="ext-gen8799" class="x-panel-body x-panel-body-noheader"&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Validation Error:&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;.&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;address -&amp;gt; g-RFC1918 'g-RFC1918' is already in use&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;.&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;address is invalid&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;.&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;vsys1&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;.&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;Error: Duplicate address name 'g-RFC1918'&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;.&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;(Module: device)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;.&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;client device phase 1 failure&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;.&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;Commit failed&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So, my basic question is: can I override a local firewall object with a Panorama object?&amp;nbsp; The alternative thus far is basically to rename "g-RFC1918" on thus-far 50 firewalls with "g-RFC1918_old" - then I push from Panorama, then I modified hundreds of policies via set commands to use the Pano-pushed version, then delete the "g-RFC1918_old"&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It's a REAL pain the rear.&amp;nbsp; Just wondering if there is a way to do this.&amp;nbsp; Thanks all.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV id="ext-comp-3785" class=" x-tab-panel"&gt;
&lt;DIV id="ext-gen8801" class="x-tab-panel-header x-unselectable x-tab-panel-header-plain"&gt;
&lt;DIV id="ext-gen8804" class="x-tab-strip-wrap"&gt;
&lt;DIV id="ext-gen8808" class="x-clear"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV id="ext-gen8805" class="x-tab-strip-spacer"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV id="ext-gen8802" class="x-tab-panel-bwrap"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 20:04:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/replace-local-firewall-object-address-with-panorama-pushed/m-p/532525#M109777</guid>
      <dc:creator>JesseLeiker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-28T20:04:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Replace Local Firewall object (address) with Panorama pushed object?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/replace-local-firewall-object-address-with-panorama-pushed/m-p/532557#M109778</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/226935"&gt;@JesseLeiker&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I don't believe that you have a path forward to do this outside of either removing/renaming the local object or changing the name in Panorama. The firewall can't create the merged_config.xml if it has two objects that have the same name, one of them will need to be renamed or removed.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 21:43:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/replace-local-firewall-object-address-with-panorama-pushed/m-p/532557#M109778</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-28T21:43:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Replace Local Firewall object (address) with Panorama pushed object?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/replace-local-firewall-object-address-with-panorama-pushed/m-p/532563#M109781</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/226935"&gt;@JesseLeiker&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What is your process to migrate the firewalls?&amp;nbsp; Generally speaking, if NGFWs will be managed by Panorama, you don't want to create very many local policies and objects.&amp;nbsp; You can migrate the 3rd party firewall configs directly to Panorama.&amp;nbsp; I am curious if it is not too late to change the process.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 22:01:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/replace-local-firewall-object-address-with-panorama-pushed/m-p/532563#M109781</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomYoung</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-28T22:01:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Replace Local Firewall object (address) with Panorama pushed object?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/replace-local-firewall-object-address-with-panorama-pushed/m-p/532580#M109782</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So it IS too late, unfortunately.&amp;nbsp; We are probably 50% migrated, 30% ready, and 20% in "planning."&amp;nbsp; The biggest issue to begin with was I was brought in after things were purchased and kind of had to build Panorama in parallels with the migrations.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; It's really not a great big deal (most of the "big" stuff is already done by the aforementioned process: renaming, swapping, removing) but I thought it would be a nice thing to have if ever it became overly tedious to get something like this done on a very large scale.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 23:19:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/replace-local-firewall-object-address-with-panorama-pushed/m-p/532580#M109782</guid>
      <dc:creator>JesseLeiker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-28T23:19:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

