<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Untagged subinterface NAT in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/untagged-subinterface-nat/m-p/539571#M110681</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;No trunking. It's a very simple network at a remote site. That's what I figured, but I was still racking my brain for a solution. I appreciate the response and thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2023 16:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ClintL</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-04-20T16:18:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Untagged subinterface NAT</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/untagged-subinterface-nat/m-p/539419#M110661</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello all,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've been reading on untagged subinterfaces and I'm not sure this scenario would even work for what I want to do. Basically I want to segment different two zones coming over the same interface. I usually accomplish this by creating a virtual-router on the core and running cables to different ports. License and hardware limitations prevent it in this scenario.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The basic setup:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ethernet1/1: 1.2.3.4 (WAN IP)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ethernet1/2.10: 10.10.10.1/24 (LAN Zone)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ethernet1/2.99: 10.10.99.1/24 (Guest Zone)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;LAN and Guest would not be able to talk. Both zones would NAT to the internet over the same WAN IP.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I know you have to do source NAT with subinterfaces, but will this scenario even work for untagged? Would I need to add an IP address to the base ethernet1/2 and NAT to that? I've tried several different NAT configurations with no success.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 19:54:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/untagged-subinterface-nat/m-p/539419#M110661</guid>
      <dc:creator>ClintL</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-19T19:54:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Untagged subinterface NAT</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/untagged-subinterface-nat/m-p/539420#M110662</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2603"&gt;@ClintL&lt;/a&gt;, is your switch trunking to eth1/1?&amp;nbsp; If so, its egress port or interface is sending traffic with vlan tags and you would need to receive/send that tagged traffic on tagged sub-interfaces.&amp;nbsp; usually, the only interface untagged is the non-sub-interface in your case eth 1/1 where all sub-interfaces carry tagged traffic.&amp;nbsp; If it is not trunking, there would be no way to diff the traffic across the link.&amp;nbsp; the same would go with vWires.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 20:03:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/untagged-subinterface-nat/m-p/539420#M110662</guid>
      <dc:creator>delliott_6784</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-19T20:03:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Untagged subinterface NAT</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/untagged-subinterface-nat/m-p/539571#M110681</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No trunking. It's a very simple network at a remote site. That's what I figured, but I was still racking my brain for a solution. I appreciate the response and thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2023 16:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/untagged-subinterface-nat/m-p/539571#M110681</guid>
      <dc:creator>ClintL</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-20T16:18:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Untagged subinterface NAT</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/untagged-subinterface-nat/m-p/539587#M110691</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think your other option is to add another physical interface (if avail) for Guest with separate IP for gateway.&amp;nbsp; Could add to a new virtual-router and add a default-route to next-vr.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2023 18:17:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/untagged-subinterface-nat/m-p/539587#M110691</guid>
      <dc:creator>delliott_6784</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-20T18:17:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

