<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: link-change still informational severity? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/link-change-still-informational-severity/m-p/539693#M110712</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It would be nice if alert severities for different events could be adjusted by admin.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For example in tiny office that has no switch and workstations connect directly to firewall it would be noisy if every workstation reboot causes critical alert in firewall.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On the other hand if firewall is in the datacenter then it is definitely event to pay attention to.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 12:30:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Raido_Rattameister</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-04-21T12:30:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>link-change still informational severity?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/link-change-still-informational-severity/m-p/539060#M110627</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can someone explain to me the rational behind allowing an interface to drop and having the link-change log a down state and yet have it be INFORMATIONAL severity level? I saw an old question about this and it seems somewhat ridiculous?&amp;nbsp; We had filtering on higher severity levels and had a circuit drop and never got the alert and then realized why.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Just curious if anyone understands the reasoning behind this?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2023 18:28:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/link-change-still-informational-severity/m-p/539060#M110627</guid>
      <dc:creator>TonyDeHart</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-17T18:28:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: link-change still informational severity?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/link-change-still-informational-severity/m-p/539618#M110696</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/272860"&gt;@TonyDeHart&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Could you share a screenshot of the alert and blur any IPs/Names? I typically have seen "Critical" for alerts such as VPN tunnel down or interface being down on the Palo. Here is a link to the &lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/9-1/pan-os-admin/monitoring/view-and-manage-logs/log-types-and-severity-levels/system-logs#id8edbfdae-ed92-4d8e-ab76-6a38f96e8cb1" target="_self"&gt;system&lt;/A&gt; logs doc.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2023 20:28:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/link-change-still-informational-severity/m-p/539618#M110696</guid>
      <dc:creator>JayGolf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-20T20:28:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: link-change still informational severity?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/link-change-still-informational-severity/m-p/539624#M110698</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is straight out of the system log from a link dropping on us.&amp;nbsp; Bonus for the HSCI being in there. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Our alerting was ignoring information as far as getting a text/email so we never knew until other services dropped that the link had failed on the firewall.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2023 20:50:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/link-change-still-informational-severity/m-p/539624#M110698</guid>
      <dc:creator>TonyDeHart</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-20T20:50:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: link-change still informational severity?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/link-change-still-informational-severity/m-p/539625#M110699</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yeah those events are informational.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Raido_Rattameister_0-1682023746450.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/49669iD4F57812B9CDCC1E/image-size/medium/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Raido_Rattameister_0-1682023746450.png" alt="Raido_Rattameister_0-1682023746450.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have dedicated syslog/email alert set up under "Device &amp;gt; Log Settings &amp;gt; System" with filter&amp;nbsp;( subtype eq port ).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can also be more specific with&amp;nbsp;"( subtype eq port ) and ( eventid eq link-change )" to notify you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2023 20:50:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/link-change-still-informational-severity/m-p/539625#M110699</guid>
      <dc:creator>Raido_Rattameister</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-20T20:50:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: link-change still informational severity?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/link-change-still-informational-severity/m-p/539687#M110711</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks. That is essentially what I did after I discovered this but I was more curious what, if anything, is the rational behind a port going doing being informational? Not sure if anyone from Palo Alto chimes in but how is this not a more critical type of alert?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 11:37:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/link-change-still-informational-severity/m-p/539687#M110711</guid>
      <dc:creator>TonyDeHart</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-21T11:37:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: link-change still informational severity?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/link-change-still-informational-severity/m-p/539693#M110712</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It would be nice if alert severities for different events could be adjusted by admin.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For example in tiny office that has no switch and workstations connect directly to firewall it would be noisy if every workstation reboot causes critical alert in firewall.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On the other hand if firewall is in the datacenter then it is definitely event to pay attention to.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 12:30:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/link-change-still-informational-severity/m-p/539693#M110712</guid>
      <dc:creator>Raido_Rattameister</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-21T12:30:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

