<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PAN OS enabling communication between overlapping subnets in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pan-os-enabling-communication-between-overlapping-subnets/m-p/548145#M111935</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am thinking about analogy with Cisco firewall. Please how can I make two hosts with same address communicate with one another on one firewall?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1) Two Virtual routers leaking with NAT in place between Virtual Routers. Directly on one FW, not with some external device. So in terms of routing "Next VR".&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2) Two Virtual systems with separate Virtual routers. And NAT implemented on External zone, enabling bi-directional communication.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Of course I dont expect that a single host will communicate on itself, there will be some dummy address spaces used in NAT statements per VR as a destination addreses for the hosts.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Which of these two paths could lead to desired end?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2023 13:38:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JLoukota</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-07-04T13:38:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PAN OS enabling communication between overlapping subnets</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pan-os-enabling-communication-between-overlapping-subnets/m-p/548145#M111935</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am thinking about analogy with Cisco firewall. Please how can I make two hosts with same address communicate with one another on one firewall?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1) Two Virtual routers leaking with NAT in place between Virtual Routers. Directly on one FW, not with some external device. So in terms of routing "Next VR".&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2) Two Virtual systems with separate Virtual routers. And NAT implemented on External zone, enabling bi-directional communication.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Of course I dont expect that a single host will communicate on itself, there will be some dummy address spaces used in NAT statements per VR as a destination addreses for the hosts.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Which of these two paths could lead to desired end?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2023 13:38:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pan-os-enabling-communication-between-overlapping-subnets/m-p/548145#M111935</guid>
      <dc:creator>JLoukota</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-04T13:38:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PAN OS enabling communication between overlapping subnets</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pan-os-enabling-communication-between-overlapping-subnets/m-p/548154#M111936</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not having an overlap would be desirable &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Alternatively you could sourceNAT to the physical interfaces in the destination subnet so the "server" side has an IP+MAC in the same broadcast domain&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2023 15:27:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pan-os-enabling-communication-between-overlapping-subnets/m-p/548154#M111936</guid>
      <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-04T15:27:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PAN OS enabling communication between overlapping subnets</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pan-os-enabling-communication-between-overlapping-subnets/m-p/548162#M111937</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, thank you for the answer. So you mean that both my solutions are valid and yours is third?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2023 18:31:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pan-os-enabling-communication-between-overlapping-subnets/m-p/548162#M111937</guid>
      <dc:creator>JLoukota</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-04T18:31:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

