<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: HA active/active dual ISP load balancing in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-active-active-dual-isp-load-balancing/m-p/556130#M112930</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/312870"&gt;@nw-rogox&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Active/active does give you the advantage of doubling your NGFW throughput.&amp;nbsp; However, in a failure scenario the throughput is cut in half which may not be desirable.&amp;nbsp; The additional complexity of active/active is generally not recommended.&amp;nbsp; Designs that are too complex tend to not only be a pain to configure as you are feeling now, but they also tend to be a pain to maintain, i.e., new problems may come up in the future.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For example, you cannot use a floating IP address in NAT unless you have a common BGP public IP across both ISPs.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I do not know of any documents to help you.&amp;nbsp; I did do a quick Google search and saw a couple videos you may look at.&amp;nbsp; They both used the switch to connect the dual ISPs to both NGFWs.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Sorry!&amp;nbsp; That is all I have.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2023 12:33:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TomYoung</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-09-01T12:33:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>HA active/active dual ISP load balancing</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-active-active-dual-isp-load-balancing/m-p/555943#M112895</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am considering network design that have:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- Dual ISP (public IP /29 for each)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- 2 x PA with active/active HA&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- PA connects directly to L2 networks (LAN)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Requires:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Load sharing between 2 ISP Internet links&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Problems:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to configure separated nat for each?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;How session can failover to remaining PA? Do I need Floating IP for WAN public?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2023 04:28:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-active-active-dual-isp-load-balancing/m-p/555943#M112895</guid>
      <dc:creator>nw-rogox</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-31T04:28:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HA active/active dual ISP load balancing</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-active-active-dual-isp-load-balancing/m-p/556008#M112901</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/312870"&gt;@nw-rogox&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would configure active/passive HA.&amp;nbsp; It is less complex than active/active.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;You can create 2 VLANs on your existing switches - one for each ISP.&amp;nbsp; (As long as you do not create a L3 IP address for the VLANs, the switches will not be accessible from the Internet.)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Then you can connect each ISP to both NGFWs and use active/passive HA.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Enable ECMP with Symmetric Return.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Configure 2 default routes.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Configure NAT normally for each ISP.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;You can tune the ECMP hashing if you have weird issues.&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/9-1/pan-os-admin/networking/ecmp/ecmp-load-balancing-algorithms" target="_blank"&gt;https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/9-1/pan-os-admin/networking/ecmp/ecmp-load-balancing-algorithms&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2023 12:49:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-active-active-dual-isp-load-balancing/m-p/556008#M112901</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomYoung</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-31T12:49:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HA active/active dual ISP load balancing</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-active-active-dual-isp-load-balancing/m-p/556115#M112921</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Tom,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Much appreciated your support.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As your idea, I need to add 1 physical uplink connection for each PA, but from ISP to PA Firewall, they provide the single RJ45 port via MediaConverter, not switches. However, I am consider to expand the connections as your idea.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;One thing that, if I use active/active mode, I can leverage the both firewall resources same time, could you give some document or ideas to establish active/active HA with both firewall facing Internet with public IP?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I tried and in ActiveActive mode, it require NAT to the Floating IP, not accept the interface's IP as usual.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2023 09:38:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-active-active-dual-isp-load-balancing/m-p/556115#M112921</guid>
      <dc:creator>nw-rogox</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-01T09:38:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HA active/active dual ISP load balancing</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-active-active-dual-isp-load-balancing/m-p/556130#M112930</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/312870"&gt;@nw-rogox&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Active/active does give you the advantage of doubling your NGFW throughput.&amp;nbsp; However, in a failure scenario the throughput is cut in half which may not be desirable.&amp;nbsp; The additional complexity of active/active is generally not recommended.&amp;nbsp; Designs that are too complex tend to not only be a pain to configure as you are feeling now, but they also tend to be a pain to maintain, i.e., new problems may come up in the future.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For example, you cannot use a floating IP address in NAT unless you have a common BGP public IP across both ISPs.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I do not know of any documents to help you.&amp;nbsp; I did do a quick Google search and saw a couple videos you may look at.&amp;nbsp; They both used the switch to connect the dual ISPs to both NGFWs.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Sorry!&amp;nbsp; That is all I have.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2023 12:33:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-active-active-dual-isp-load-balancing/m-p/556130#M112930</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomYoung</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-01T12:33:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HA active/active dual ISP load balancing</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-active-active-dual-isp-load-balancing/m-p/1231220#M124507</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;One note, ECMP is only available for some hardware models.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 15:11:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-active-active-dual-isp-load-balancing/m-p/1231220#M124507</guid>
      <dc:creator>B.Bagheri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-06T15:11:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

