<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SD-WAN Hub and Branch PANOS versions in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/sd-wan-hub-and-branch-panos-versions/m-p/565374#M114339</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Recommend looking at matching panos versions to plugin versions.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/sd-wan/3-1/sd-wan-admin/sd-wan-overview/system-requirements-for-sd-wan" target="_blank"&gt;https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/sd-wan/3-1/sd-wan-admin/sd-wan-overview/system-requirements-for-sd-wan&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I don't see a requirement for matching panos and plugin versions across the network but it would make sense that you might open yourself up to compatibility/bug issues with different plugin versions communicating.&amp;nbsp; Too easy to upgrade to a common set of panos versions/plugins for Panorama and all firewalls.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2023 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>delliott_6784</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-11-13T14:30:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SD-WAN Hub and Branch PANOS versions</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/sd-wan-hub-and-branch-panos-versions/m-p/565330#M114332</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is there a requirement for PANOS version to match for SD-WAN or for the Hub site to be of a higher version of PANOS.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Example: Hub is on version 10.2.4, Branch is on 10.2.6&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Would there be any issue with this?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2023 10:14:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/sd-wan-hub-and-branch-panos-versions/m-p/565330#M114332</guid>
      <dc:creator>teaton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-13T10:14:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SD-WAN Hub and Branch PANOS versions</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/sd-wan-hub-and-branch-panos-versions/m-p/565374#M114339</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Recommend looking at matching panos versions to plugin versions.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/sd-wan/3-1/sd-wan-admin/sd-wan-overview/system-requirements-for-sd-wan" target="_blank"&gt;https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/sd-wan/3-1/sd-wan-admin/sd-wan-overview/system-requirements-for-sd-wan&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I don't see a requirement for matching panos and plugin versions across the network but it would make sense that you might open yourself up to compatibility/bug issues with different plugin versions communicating.&amp;nbsp; Too easy to upgrade to a common set of panos versions/plugins for Panorama and all firewalls.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2023 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/sd-wan-hub-and-branch-panos-versions/m-p/565374#M114339</guid>
      <dc:creator>delliott_6784</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-13T14:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

