<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: LACP MAC Movement and Doubts in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/lacp-mac-movement-and-doubts/m-p/569248#M114833</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/178856"&gt;@Ramakrishnan&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The switch will learn of the passive only if a failover happens, at which point the (formerly passive) firewall will send a gratuitous ARP which will tell the switch to forward packets on the new port even though the IP and MAC are the same.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Management-Articles/Gratuitous-ARP-in-HA-Failover/ta-p/62781" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Management-Articles/Gratuitous-ARP-in-HA-Failover/ta-p/62781&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA14u000000sah9CAA&amp;amp;lang=en_US%E2%80%A9" target="_blank"&gt;https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA14u000000sah9CAA&amp;amp;lang=en_US%E2%80%A9&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-active-passive-mac-address/td-p/227316" target="_blank"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-active-passive-mac-address/td-p/227316&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV style="display: inline;"&gt;Passive Device:&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;LI-WRAPPER&gt;—LACP or LLDP is not configured on the interface and the firewall does not participate in the protocol, but allows the peers on either side of the firewall to pre-negotiate LACP or LLDP, respectively:&lt;/LI-WRAPPER&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-admin/high-availability/ha-concepts/lacp-and-lldp-pre-negotiation-for-activepassive-ha" target="_blank"&gt;https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-admin/high-availability/ha-concepts/lacp-and-lldp-pre-negotiation-for-activepassive-ha&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Kind regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Kim.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2023 10:57:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kiwi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-12-11T10:57:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>LACP MAC Movement and Doubts</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/lacp-mac-movement-and-doubts/m-p/569237#M114832</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Folks,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;First time I'm deploying PAs with LACP active/passive for HA solutions. I have some doubts couldn't get enough information from Internet source.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1.&amp;nbsp; In the event, if one firewall goes down, PC on SW1 goes down, how this mac and arp movement happening?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Interestingly when I give show interface on PA's both FW1 &amp;amp; 2 sharing same AE MAC, so wondering how MAC[GARP] movement&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;will kick in during FO event.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV id="tinyMceEditorRamakrishnan_2" class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Ramakrishnan_3-1702285551757.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/55802iDC288C47F02C9284/image-size/medium/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Ramakrishnan_3-1702285551757.png" alt="Ramakrishnan_3-1702285551757.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. When I see lacp on PAFW1and2's what does mean system MAC and Partner MAC, in fact I couldn't see any ware in the switch. Where I get those details to study more about this?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Pre-negotiation: Enabled&lt;BR /&gt;Local: System Priority: 32768&lt;BR /&gt;System MAC: D:A:B:C:1a:01&lt;BR /&gt;Key: 66&lt;BR /&gt;Partner: System Priority: 65534&lt;BR /&gt;System MAC: A:B:C:D19:34:00&lt;BR /&gt;Key: 1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3. LACPDUs message are seeing [Sent and Recv counters are getting increase] on both fws. Why passive fw also doing LACPDUs sending and participating LACP election?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2023 10:09:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/lacp-mac-movement-and-doubts/m-p/569237#M114832</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ramakrishnan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-11T10:09:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LACP MAC Movement and Doubts</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/lacp-mac-movement-and-doubts/m-p/569248#M114833</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/178856"&gt;@Ramakrishnan&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The switch will learn of the passive only if a failover happens, at which point the (formerly passive) firewall will send a gratuitous ARP which will tell the switch to forward packets on the new port even though the IP and MAC are the same.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Management-Articles/Gratuitous-ARP-in-HA-Failover/ta-p/62781" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Management-Articles/Gratuitous-ARP-in-HA-Failover/ta-p/62781&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA14u000000sah9CAA&amp;amp;lang=en_US%E2%80%A9" target="_blank"&gt;https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA14u000000sah9CAA&amp;amp;lang=en_US%E2%80%A9&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-active-passive-mac-address/td-p/227316" target="_blank"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-active-passive-mac-address/td-p/227316&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV style="display: inline;"&gt;Passive Device:&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;LI-WRAPPER&gt;—LACP or LLDP is not configured on the interface and the firewall does not participate in the protocol, but allows the peers on either side of the firewall to pre-negotiate LACP or LLDP, respectively:&lt;/LI-WRAPPER&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-admin/high-availability/ha-concepts/lacp-and-lldp-pre-negotiation-for-activepassive-ha" target="_blank"&gt;https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-admin/high-availability/ha-concepts/lacp-and-lldp-pre-negotiation-for-activepassive-ha&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Kind regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Kim.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2023 10:57:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/lacp-mac-movement-and-doubts/m-p/569248#M114833</guid>
      <dc:creator>kiwi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-11T10:57:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

