<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Best upgrade practice with HA Pair ? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/best-upgrade-practice-with-ha-pair/m-p/569459#M114854</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We are preparing to update this weekend to 10.2.7 to resolve the expiring root certificate issue. We have an HA pair that we want to failover while upgrading as to not disrupt service. While I have the upgrade path from the Palo documentation what I am not sure of is if I can fully upgrade the secondary, failover and then fully upgrade the primary and fail back or if I need to fail back and forth between each step? See below, which option is recommended? Obviously Option A is the preferred choice if it will work but I want to be sure doing it that way won't cause an issue.&amp;nbsp; What do others do?&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Option A&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Upgrade secondary to 10.1.11h1 &lt;BR /&gt;Upgrade Secondary to 10.2&lt;BR /&gt;Upgrade Secondary to 10.2.7&lt;BR /&gt;Fail over to Secondary&lt;BR /&gt;Upgrade Primary to 10.1.11h1&lt;BR /&gt;Upgrade Primary to 10.2&lt;BR /&gt;Upgrade Primary to 10.2.7&lt;BR /&gt;Fail back over to Primary&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Option B&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Upgrade secondary to 10.1.11h1 &lt;BR /&gt;Fail over to Secondary&lt;BR /&gt;Upgrade Primary to 10.1.11h1&lt;BR /&gt;Fail over to Primary&lt;BR /&gt;Upgrade Secondary to 10.2&lt;BR /&gt;Fail over to Secondary&lt;BR /&gt;Upgrade Primary to 10.2&lt;BR /&gt;Fail over to Primary&lt;BR /&gt;Upgrade Secondary to 10.2.7&lt;BR /&gt;Fail over to Secondary&lt;BR /&gt;Upgrade Primary to 10.2.7&lt;BR /&gt;Fail over to Primary&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2023 13:50:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Walt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-12-12T13:50:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Best upgrade practice with HA Pair ?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/best-upgrade-practice-with-ha-pair/m-p/569459#M114854</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We are preparing to update this weekend to 10.2.7 to resolve the expiring root certificate issue. We have an HA pair that we want to failover while upgrading as to not disrupt service. While I have the upgrade path from the Palo documentation what I am not sure of is if I can fully upgrade the secondary, failover and then fully upgrade the primary and fail back or if I need to fail back and forth between each step? See below, which option is recommended? Obviously Option A is the preferred choice if it will work but I want to be sure doing it that way won't cause an issue.&amp;nbsp; What do others do?&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Option A&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Upgrade secondary to 10.1.11h1 &lt;BR /&gt;Upgrade Secondary to 10.2&lt;BR /&gt;Upgrade Secondary to 10.2.7&lt;BR /&gt;Fail over to Secondary&lt;BR /&gt;Upgrade Primary to 10.1.11h1&lt;BR /&gt;Upgrade Primary to 10.2&lt;BR /&gt;Upgrade Primary to 10.2.7&lt;BR /&gt;Fail back over to Primary&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Option B&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Upgrade secondary to 10.1.11h1 &lt;BR /&gt;Fail over to Secondary&lt;BR /&gt;Upgrade Primary to 10.1.11h1&lt;BR /&gt;Fail over to Primary&lt;BR /&gt;Upgrade Secondary to 10.2&lt;BR /&gt;Fail over to Secondary&lt;BR /&gt;Upgrade Primary to 10.2&lt;BR /&gt;Fail over to Primary&lt;BR /&gt;Upgrade Secondary to 10.2.7&lt;BR /&gt;Fail over to Secondary&lt;BR /&gt;Upgrade Primary to 10.2.7&lt;BR /&gt;Fail over to Primary&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2023 13:50:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/best-upgrade-practice-with-ha-pair/m-p/569459#M114854</guid>
      <dc:creator>Walt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-12T13:50:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best upgrade practice with HA Pair ?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/best-upgrade-practice-with-ha-pair/m-p/569490#M114857</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Option A would be the route I take.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-upgrade/upgrade-pan-os/upgrade-the-firewall-pan-os/upgrade-an-ha-firewall-pair" target="_blank"&gt;https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-upgrade/upgrade-pan-os/upgrade-the-firewall-pan-os/upgrade-an-ha-firewall-pair&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2023 15:49:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/best-upgrade-practice-with-ha-pair/m-p/569490#M114857</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-12T15:49:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

