<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: problems with dns resolutions in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/problems-with-dns-resolutions/m-p/572015#M115128</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;If all users have the same version of global protec 5.2.10-6, both the DNS prefix and everything is correct, they are specific cases in 4 users now it is becoming like a snowball since the users are increasing, which yes What I can see is that when a user tries to access the service it is not shown in the FW.&lt;BR /&gt;what I mean is that there is no connection log to port 443 even though the user telnets to that port.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2024 17:00:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JoseJarrin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-01-07T17:00:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>problems with dns resolutions</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/problems-with-dns-resolutions/m-p/571832#M115106</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, I have a problem with a DNS resolution, in some users with the GP agent 5.2.10-6 we can reach a resource for example vmare.x.x, but with other users.&lt;BR /&gt;There are several important points here:&lt;BR /&gt;All users have the same version of the global protect agent.&lt;BR /&gt;To reach the vware resource, the user connects to the VPN that is located on vsys 1 and goes to vsy2.&lt;BR /&gt;security policies are not blocking any user.&lt;BR /&gt;When a user who does not access this resource, no log is found or displayed in the fw Monitoring.&lt;BR /&gt;As a substitute measure, we configure this resolution for the user on the machine itself.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Do you have any idea how to solve this problem?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2024 21:37:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/problems-with-dns-resolutions/m-p/571832#M115106</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoseJarrin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-04T21:37:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: problems with dns resolutions</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/problems-with-dns-resolutions/m-p/571926#M115113</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do all users get the same GlobalProtect Gateway client settings? Specifically, the network services piece contain the dns servers and dns suffix.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2024 15:17:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/problems-with-dns-resolutions/m-p/571926#M115113</guid>
      <dc:creator>Claw4609</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-05T15:17:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: problems with dns resolutions</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/problems-with-dns-resolutions/m-p/572015#M115128</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If all users have the same version of global protec 5.2.10-6, both the DNS prefix and everything is correct, they are specific cases in 4 users now it is becoming like a snowball since the users are increasing, which yes What I can see is that when a user tries to access the service it is not shown in the FW.&lt;BR /&gt;what I mean is that there is no connection log to port 443 even though the user telnets to that port.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2024 17:00:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/problems-with-dns-resolutions/m-p/572015#M115128</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoseJarrin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-07T17:00:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

