<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: HA A/P: BGP routes synchronzation in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-a-p-bgp-routes-synchronzation/m-p/581945#M116433</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;BGP route are not synced between A/P HA pair. After fail over the routing process starts on the passive unit and a new neighbor relationship is established between the new active fw (after failover) with the peers.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can use BFD which will help upstream and downstream devices to continue using the previous route table while the new BGP connection is re-established with the new HA peer and not cause disruptions.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope the above helps.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 22:24:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mrajdev</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-03-27T22:24:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>HA A/P: BGP routes synchronzation</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-a-p-bgp-routes-synchronzation/m-p/258508#M73306</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a doubt regarding the synchronization of BGP routes learnt by the active firewall.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reviewing the BGP route informationin in the active node with the following commands:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; show routing protocol bgp loc-rib&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; show routing protocol bgp rib-out&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BGP seems is working fine in the active firewall, as the firewall has routes in his loc-rib table and advertise routes in his rib-out table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But reviewing the same BGP information in the passive firewall, nothing is shown in loc-rib table and rib-out table.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As I can see HA A/P synchronizes the following runtime information:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Session Table&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Neighbor discovery (ND) table&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- MAC table&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;System runtime information synchronization: &lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/8-1/pan-os-admin/high-availability/reference-ha-synchronization/synchronization-of-system-runtime-information.html#" target="_blank"&gt;https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/8-1/pan-os-admin/high-availability/reference-ha-synchronization/synchronization-of-system-runtime-information.html#&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But what about BGP routing information?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the expected behavior? BGP routing information is not synchronized between HA active/passive?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should BGP routing information be synchronized between HA active/passive peers?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help is really appreciated as I'm not sure what is expected.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alberto&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 08:36:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-a-p-bgp-routes-synchronzation/m-p/258508#M73306</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alberto.Espinosa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-24T08:36:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HA A/P: BGP routes synchronzation</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-a-p-bgp-routes-synchronzation/m-p/581945#M116433</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;BGP route are not synced between A/P HA pair. After fail over the routing process starts on the passive unit and a new neighbor relationship is established between the new active fw (after failover) with the peers.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can use BFD which will help upstream and downstream devices to continue using the previous route table while the new BGP connection is re-established with the new HA peer and not cause disruptions.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope the above helps.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 22:24:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-a-p-bgp-routes-synchronzation/m-p/581945#M116433</guid>
      <dc:creator>mrajdev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-27T22:24:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

