<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Source NAT Pool range  use case  practices in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/source-nat-pool-range-use-case-practices/m-p/587328#M117175</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/374776043"&gt;@pattarachaiKH&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can you describe your question in a bit more in detail? Are you just questioning why you would want to utilize Dynamic IP and Port over just Dynamic IP? A DIPP source NAT is likely &lt;EM&gt;the &lt;/EM&gt;most prolific type of source NAT across all PAN deployments simply because it's the most prevalent NAT for trust-&amp;gt;untrust traffic. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 22:02:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-05-20T22:02:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Source NAT Pool range  use case  practices</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/source-nat-pool-range-use-case-practices/m-p/587228#M117162</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Expert ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would like to consult about how can use&amp;nbsp; Source NAT Pool range with multiple clients to source NAT pool can use DIPP ( Dynamic IP and ports) or Dynamic source nat&amp;nbsp; actually I hesitate to use DIPP because I think suitable than dynamic source nat but I'm not sure correctly or not ? please suggest me&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 03:16:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/source-nat-pool-range-use-case-practices/m-p/587228#M117162</guid>
      <dc:creator>pattarachaiKH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-20T03:16:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Source NAT Pool range  use case  practices</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/source-nat-pool-range-use-case-practices/m-p/587328#M117175</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/374776043"&gt;@pattarachaiKH&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can you describe your question in a bit more in detail? Are you just questioning why you would want to utilize Dynamic IP and Port over just Dynamic IP? A DIPP source NAT is likely &lt;EM&gt;the &lt;/EM&gt;most prolific type of source NAT across all PAN deployments simply because it's the most prevalent NAT for trust-&amp;gt;untrust traffic. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 22:02:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/source-nat-pool-range-use-case-practices/m-p/587328#M117175</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-20T22:02:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

