<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Local IKE interface and Tunnel interface in different virtual routers in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/local-ike-interface-and-tunnel-interface-in-different-virtual/m-p/588239#M117297</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;How did you resolve this approach?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please share the link if it is possible.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 09:54:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Parsek</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-05-29T09:54:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Local IKE interface and Tunnel interface in different virtual routers</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/local-ike-interface-and-tunnel-interface-in-different-virtual/m-p/214678#M62368</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Does Palo Alto allow having the Local IKE interface&amp;nbsp; in "default" virtual router and the Tunnel interface in different virtual router when setting up site-to-site ipsec tunnels ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The use case of this to achieve multitenancy and overcome situations when different customers (&amp;nbsp;with overlapping lan subnets) connecting to a Hosted Enviromnet .&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 09:00:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/local-ike-interface-and-tunnel-interface-in-different-virtual/m-p/214678#M62368</guid>
      <dc:creator>viks_a</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-18T09:00:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Local IKE interface and Tunnel interface in different virtual routers</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/local-ike-interface-and-tunnel-interface-in-different-virtual/m-p/214693#M62372</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 13:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/local-ike-interface-and-tunnel-interface-in-different-virtual/m-p/214693#M62372</guid>
      <dc:creator>9t89m8fu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-18T13:05:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Local IKE interface and Tunnel interface in different virtual routers</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/local-ike-interface-and-tunnel-interface-in-different-virtual/m-p/588239#M117297</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;How did you resolve this approach?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please share the link if it is possible.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 09:54:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/local-ike-interface-and-tunnel-interface-in-different-virtual/m-p/588239#M117297</guid>
      <dc:creator>Parsek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-29T09:54:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

